Advanced Search Results

Kanakam Srinivasa Rao Vs. Ganga Venkateswara Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 73

Reported in : AIR2003AP38; 2002(6)ALD169; 2002(6)ALT201

which received assets not required - attachment of assets not mandatory requirement for grant of rateable distribution. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … credit of the suit. At that stage the 1st Respondent herein filed EA No. 388 of 2001, under Section 73 C.P.C., praying the Executing Court to pass appropriate orders for rateable distribution of the amount of Rs. 62,000/-.

Kashinath Seth and anr. Vs. the Collector, Central Excise, Allahabad a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitution of India - Article 141; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 55, 55(2) and 66; Gold (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 71, 73, 74 and 75

Reported in : AIR1976All35

of entire stock in trade - illegal and in excess of the powers conferred upon the authorities. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … terms of Section 79 and he has a right of appeal under Section 80 but the provision of Section 73 which allows the levy of a fine in lieu of confiscation not exceeding twice the value of the

V. Umamaheswara Rao Vs. Shaik HussaIn Saheb and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 73, 73(1), 75, 75(1) and 75(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2004AP59; 2004(4)ALD322; 2003(4)ALT476

time of enquiry made pertaining to registration - held, petitioners not justified in challenging registration of deed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … petitioners. As the Sub-Register refused to register sale deeds, first respondent filed two applications before second respondent under Section 73 of the Act against order of Sub-Registrar, Vuyyuru, dated 14-2-1996 refusing to register a sale deed on the

Nallabothu Purnaiah Vs. Garre Mallikarjuna Rao (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 73; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 16 and 20

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD260

in rejecting evidence led by appellant - held, appellant entitled to specific performance of agreement of sale. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 45) or by one familiar with the handwriting of the person concerned (Section 47) or by the Court (Section 73). The two paragraphs of the section are not mutually exclusive. They are complementary to each other. Section 73

K. Srinivas Rao and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secreta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 21; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 16, 17, 18 and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 162

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD510

Force is contrary to law but not precluded from taking any decision on subject accordance with law. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … This order can be said to have been passed in exercise of the Executive powers conferred under Article 73 of the Constitution of India. It is settled principle of law that Executive Instructions, whether issued by the

State of A.P. and ors. Vs. Singam Setty Yellananda

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35 and 80; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 74

Reported in : AIR2003AP182; 2003(2)ARBLR92(AP)

damages - held, decree passed by Trial Court after giving detailed reasoning needs no interference in appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ambit of the relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act in the this regard in general and Sections 73 and 74 of the said Act, in particular. The learned Counsel also had drawn my attention to a

Challa Rajendra Prasad Vs. Asian Coffee Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53 and 53(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 73

Reported in : [2000]100CompCas689(AP); (1999)2CompLJ46(AP)

time of posting of notice - held, facts proved that notice was valid and within Rule 73. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Devi Prasad and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 239 and 337; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 45, 47 and 73

Reported in : AIR1967All64; 1967CriLJ134

by him always open for scrutiny - rules to be followed for identifying any disguise in handwriting. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … conclusions (See Manindra v. Mahalaxmi Bank Ltd. at p. 107; and G. Madhavayya v. G, Achamma . Indeed, Section 73 of the Indian Evidence Act empowers courts of law to compare admitted and disputed writings for the purposes

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Brijlal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 1890 - Sections 73, 73, 73C and 74A; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1963All1

prove misconduct/negligence - held, plaintiff could not prove misconduct - railway not liable for damage of goods. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … sent back to the Court below forthwith. Civil - liability of railway for damages - Sections 72, 74A, 73, 77-C of Railways Act, 1890 - cloth bales damage - damage due to negligence or fault in packing

Jwala Prasad and ors. Vs. Shama Charan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : AIR1920All353(1); (1920)ILR42All55; 52Ind.Cas.235

Act), Schedule I, Articles 73 and 80 - Limitation--Promissory note--'Writing retaining or postponing the right to sue.' - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.