Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 72 · Page 1 of about 107 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 1990

ilam Singh Vs. Vith Addl. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-19-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47, 73 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 72, 84, 84(1) and (2), 85, 86, 90 and 94

Reported in : AIR1991All34

the deposit - non compliance - sale a nullity - Court has discretion to forfeit the deposit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … resold. (2) Where the decree-holder is the purchaser and is entitled to set-off the purchase money under Rule 72, the Court may dispense with the requirement of this rule.' For Allahabad High Court there is an addition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2002

East City Defence Personnel Welfare Association Vs. District Collector ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 22A and 72; Bhoodan Act - Sections 12 and 15; Andhra Pradesh (T.A.) Land Revenue Act, 1317-Fasli; Agricultural Land Accessment Act; Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands Prohibition of Transfer Act, 1977

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD41

upon registration by District Collector - High Court cannot direct authority to register document under writ jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … also noted that against the order of the Sub-Registrar refusing to register a document, an appeal lies under Section 72 of the Registration Act to the Registrar to whom the Sub-Registrar is subordinate. Be it also noted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1914

Champa Lal Vs. Rupan Singh,

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-19-1914

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1915)ILR37All81

72 - Mortgage--Right of mortgagee in possession to charge for repairs and additions to the mortgaged property. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 1998

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. P.B. Jai Singh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-23-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72, 75, 77(1) and 263

Reported in : [1999]237ITR513(AP)

assessment year. Income Tax Act 1961 s.72 Income Tax Act 1961 s.75 Income Tax Act 1961 s.77 - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1991

Mohammad Javed Vs. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P., Luckn ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-24-1991

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 43(3), 48, 48(3) and 72(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1992All38

impugned Order cannot be declared to be bad and RTA had jurisdiction to impose model conditions-Petition Dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of stage carriage is much more than a mini bus and ten years model condition is not justified.4. Section 72(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 gives powers to the RTA to grant stage carriage permits of specified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2002

Gorantla Venkateswarlu Vs. B. Demudu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-26-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 72 and 74

Reported in : AIR2003AP251; 2003(2)ALD649

and no fraud committed - held, allegations made by appellant in his complaint found to be false. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … payment. Parties are directed to bear their own costs in this Appeal. Criminal - defamatory statement - Sections 72 and 74 of Evidence Act, 1872 - respondent (officer of Bank of India) deputed to act as managing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1956

L. Pyare Lal Vs. Governor-general of India in Council

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-1956

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 to 101

Reported in : AIR1957All21

the plaintiff - held, plaintiff could not prove misconduct - railway not liable for damage of goods. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … correct. THE COURT 20. We dismiss the appeal with costs. Civil - liability of railway for damages - Section 72 of Railways Act, 1890 - tins of ghee damaged - damage due to negligence or fault in packing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1961

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Brijlal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-30-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 1890 - Sections 73, 73, 73C and 74A; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1963All1

prove misconduct/negligence - held, plaintiff could not prove misconduct - railway not liable for damage of goods. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … shall be sent back to the Court below forthwith. Civil - liability of railway for damages - Sections 72, 74A, 73, 77-C of Railways Act, 1890 - cloth bales damage - damage due to negligence or fault

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

The Government, North-western Provinces Vs. Shugan Chand

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All79

Act IX of 1872, Section 72 - Liability of person to whom money is paid by mistake. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1977

Gopi Nath and Sons Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-14-1977

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 73

Reported in : AIR1978All79

re-weighing - held, consignee can claim damages after accepting delivery but can not claim delivery after re-weighing. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … has no merit and is dismissed. Parties shall bear their own costs. Civil - right of consignee - Section 72 of Railways Act, 1890 and Chapter 1 Rule 118 and Chapter 3 Rules 32 and 33 of Railways

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial