Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 71 · Page 1 of about 55 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 19 1975

Kashinath Seth and anr. Vs. the Collector, Central Excise, Allahabad a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-1975

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitution of India - Article 141; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 55, 55(2) and 66; Gold (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 71, 73, 74 and 75

Reported in : AIR1976All35

of entire stock in trade - illegal and in excess of the powers conferred upon the authorities. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ORDERR.B. Misra, J.1. These are two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutionality of Section 71 read with Sections 73. 74, and 75 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 being violative of Article 19

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 29 2003

Hyderabad Co-operative Central Trading Society Limited Vs. Registrar o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-29-2003

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesBanking

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 61, 71, 76 and 101; Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD768

law under which borrower is registered - application of Article 226 not required as substitutive remedy available. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of Central Registrar.5. The other submission that petitioner society not being a member of the third respondent society, Section 71 has no application is also without substance. HDCC Bank though is not a scheduled bank as defined under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Empress of India Vs. Ajudhia

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All644

X of 1872 (Criminal Procedure Code), Sections 314, 452, 454,455--Act XLV of 1860 (Penal Code), Section 71. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 15 1999

Ashok Jain, Adv. Vs. Xiiith Additional District Judge, Agra and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 - Sections 6, 12(3) and 71

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC51; (1999)3UPLBEC2391

- held, ordering rechecking of ballots bad in law and contrary to law of privacy of ballots. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … not be interfered.6. On behalf of the petitioner law In this regard has been relied onas contained in Section 71 of U. P. Municipal Corporations Act, 1959 and the law decided in the case decided by the Full

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Empress of India Vs. Ram AdhIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All139

of 1860 (Penal Code, Sections 71, 146, 147, 319, 323 - Offence made up of several offences--Rioting--Hurt. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2007

K. Surender Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-06-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 71 and 72

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD645

under Section 72 of the Act.With the above directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … said action on the part of the second respondent is contrary to the statutory requirements. The provisions of Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908 clearly mandates that the Registering Authority, if refused to register a document, has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2002

N.K.C.D. Patel Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Defence and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-22-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 475 and 549; Defence Service Regulations - Regulation 448; Army Regulations; Indian Military Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 33 and 226

Reported in : 2003(2)ALT199

do not find any merit in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the provisions of Section 71(a), (b) and (c) of The Army Act, 1950 are unconstitutional and ultra vires.2. The facts in brief are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1924

Sheikh Karimullah Vs. Gudar Koeri and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-27-1924

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1925All56; 82Ind.Cas.306

of document, whether can be proved by secondary evidence--ss. 67 to 73, whether deal with secondary evidence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Section 68 were insisted upon. This difficulty however can be overcome by the application of the provisions of Section 71. If the plaintiff had summoned the two attesting witnesses and they denied execution either through collusion or absence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2013

Ex. Gunner (Operator) T. Suresh, Vs. the Chief of Army Staff New Delhi ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on : Apr-03-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

sides, it has become necessary for us to peruse the various punishments awardable by Court Martial given under section 71 of the Army Act, 1950. In the said enlistment of punishment there is no mention to discharge as … I understand and I sign it as correct”. The said statement was signed by the applicant at Ferozpur Cantonment on 24.03.2006. The version of the applicant in the above statement makes us to disbelieve the version of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2005

Kusa Lingaiah Vs. Pandiri Laxmaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Partnership Act; Hyderabad Money Lenders Act; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Money Lenders Act - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 33

Reported in : AIR2006AP121; 2006(2)ALD98; 2006(2)ALT228

Matched in: Citation AIR2006AP121; 2006(2)ALD98; 2006(2)ALT228

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial