Advanced Search Results
J.K. Finance and Chit Funds Vs. R. Surya Kumar and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-07-2003
ContractCivil
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2)
AIR2004AP190; 2004(1)ALD847; II(2004)BC558
requirement of Section 69 (2) complied with - registration of partnership deed separately not a necessary stipulation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSreeram Finance Corporation, Ongole Vs. K. Devashahayam and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-04-1997
Commercial
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 30, Rule 1
1998(2)ALD274A; 1997(6)ALT560
High Court opined compliance with only one of conditions sufficient - District Munsif's dismissal Order turned down. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … plaintiff! However, while determining point No.3 viz., whether the suit is not maintainable in view of non-compliance of Section 69(2) of IndianPartnership Act, the learned District Munsif held in the negative. The reason being that according to sub-section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe National Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. ...
Allahabad
May-19-1976
PropertyCivil
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 69 and 69(4); Land Revenue Act - Sections 179 abd 180; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 162(1), 171, 172, 176, 177 and 179; Civil Proceduer Code , 1908 - Sections 73
AIR1977All63
for purpose of Section 69 not to include statutory sale under U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.V. Rama Krishna Vs. R. Subbamma and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-24-2001
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21 - Rules 69(2) and 90
2001(5)ALT657
interval between two adjournments is more than thirty days - no irregularity by respondent in conducting sale. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … two lakh rupees and the 2nd respondent knocked away the same at a substantially lower amount of Rs. 69,000/-, and that the sale is a collusive and nominal one and that with the connivance of the other
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Prasad Vs. Paras Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-18-1963
Commercial
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(1) and 69(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 6 and 130
AIR1964All15
a partner - suit by partner against debtor to recover his shares - held, suit was maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … due from Hardeo Singh had been paid off by him, and that the present suit was barred by Section 69 of the Partnership-Act as well as Section, 130 of the Transfer of Property Act.2. The trial Court repelled
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rampa Devi and ors. Vs. Bishambhar Nath Puri and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-24-1975
Arbitration
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 58, 58(3), 58(4) and 69; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20
AIR1976All19
arbitrator and refer the dispute to him - non registration of firm does not invalidate arbitration clause. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under Section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act and therefore the petition was barred by the provisions of Section 69 of that Act The matter was brought to this Court in appeal. The order of the court below
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhote Lal Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board
Allahabad
Jul-04-1989
Commercial
Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 56, 69, 69(1), (2), (3) and (4); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(2), 20 and 34; Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 19; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887
AIR1990All27
no right to enforce its rights arising out of a contract - such a suit is barred. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … contract being unregistered, the plaintiff was not entitled to claim any amount as the suit was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act. It was also contended that the dispute sought to be referred to arbitration
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.J.M. Prasada Rao Vs. Chairman, Visakhapatnam Port Trust and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-27-2001
Service
Visakhapatnam Post Employees' (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations, 1968 - Regulations 8 and 10(3) to 10(23) - Rule 12; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 9, 9(4), 9(10), 30 and 69
2001(5)ALT381
justified in sanctioning provisional pension - respondents were directed to release full pension with interest at 12%. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … per the Government of India decision No.6, under rule 9 grant of 100% provisional pension under rule Rule 69 is mandatory even if departmental proceedings are continued. It is also submitted that the same rule (Rule 69)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhey Shyam Vs. Beni Ram Mool Chand
Allahabad
Feb-08-1966
Civil
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(3)
AIR1967All28
- suit filed for recovery of assets after dissolution of unregistered firm is not barred by law. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the balance of the amount claimed by the plaintiff was due, that the suit was not barred by Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act as the plaintiff firm had been dissolved before the suit, that the plaintiff
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParas Nath and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Jul-28-1967
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 386(1), 401 and 401(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 64, 68 and 69
AIR1969All116; 1969CriLJ350
fine remains and accused can be legally sent to jail to serve the remaining period of imprisonment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … imposition of the sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of the fine, are Sections 64, 68 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code. These Sections stand thus:--'64. In every case of an offence punishable with imprisonment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »