Advanced Search Results

Shahid Khan Vs. Director of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 22, 23, 25, 27A, 28, 29, 42, 42(1), 42(2) and 67; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 132; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 139 and 228

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)781; 2001CriLJ3183

admissible - prosecution could not prove accused guilty beyond doubts - appellants acquitted giving benefit of doubt. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … further submitted that whatever information was collected by the Officer from the accused is no evidence in law. Section 67 of NDPS Act is at the stage enquiry only which cannot be equated with section 108 of the

K. Rama Mohan Rao, Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 57, 67 and 256(2)

Reported in : [2000]241ITR107(AP)

appreciation of facts - held, no question of law arose for consideration and income tax case dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … assessees could not be allowed under Section 57 of the Income-tax Act nor can it be allowed under Section 67 as the borrowings were utilised for the purpose of business of the firm which had become defunct and

M.A. Majeed Vs. the Appellate Authority/Managing Director, State Bank ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; State Bank of Hyderabad (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 - Regulations 3, 67, 68 and 68(1) ; Subsidiary Banks General Regulations, 1959 - Regulations 36, 37 and 38(4)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD148

from contending that enquiry was not properly and fairly conducted by enquiry officers after completion of enquiry. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under Regulation 68 the Disciplinary Authority alone has got the power to impose the punishment contemplated under Regulation 67, therefore, the impugned order passed by the Chief General Manager who was designated by the Board dismissing the

Thimmareddypalem Grampanchayat Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchyat Act, 1964 - Sections 62, 67 and 68; Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchyat Raj Act, 1994

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD560

which was set aside by Civil Court - held, notification illegal and petitioner entitled to possess land. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the said notice in its entirety. It reads as under:'In exercise of powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 67 of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 read with G.O. Ms. No. 647, Panchayat Samithi Department dated

Kummathi Narayanappa Vs. Talari Akkulappa and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rules 54(2), 66, 67 and 90

Reported in : AIR1965AP215

- also clear violation of mandatory provisions - held, impugned sale by decree holders concluded without proclamation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … C. P. C. The procedure for proclamation of sale is laid down under O. XXI Rules 66 and 67 C. P. C. R. 67 (1) provides that : 'Every proclamation shall be published, as nearly as may

Radhey Shyam Tandon Vs. the Judge (Appeals) Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Rules, 1948 - Rules 67, 68, 69 and 77A

Reported in : AIR1953All57

restricted only to the party himself or a qualified pleader or a registered accountant engaged by him. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … or (Revisions), (right?) to appear and plead on their behalf. The relevant rules relating to this matter are 67,68 and 69. Rule 67 (1) provides that the memorandum of appeal can be presented by the appellant or

Sheikh Karimullah Vs. Gudar Koeri and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1925All56; 82Ind.Cas.306

of document, whether can be proved by secondary evidence--ss. 67 to 73, whether deal with secondary evidence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Kakinada Municipal Contractors Sankshema Sangham Vs. Collector, Kakina ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 59, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 70 and 164; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities (Municipal Works) Rules, 1967; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities (Registration of Contractors) Rules, 1978

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD293; 2001(1)ALT318

Act is valid - held, Municipal Council has option to execute works through petitioner or through department. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the explanation, if any, received therewith and, if necessary, take action under sub-section (2) of Section 164.12. Further Section 67 of the Act provides that the District Collector may enter on and inspect, or cause to be entered

Salek Chand Vs. Abdul Razaq

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 20 - Schedule - Article 67

Reported in : AIR1974All94

'prescribed period' means period prescribed for limitation of suit and not period prescribed for repayment of loan. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on 20th December 1960 extended the period of suit under Section 20 of the Limitation Act (Old). Article 67, Schedule I of the Limitation Act provides a period of three years for a suit, the period is

Ganges Sugar Works Ld. Vs. Nuri Miah

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Reported in : AIR1915All284; (1915)ILR37All273

and 123 - Contracts entered into by companies--Agreement to refer to arbitration--Whether seal of the company necessary. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … decide whether or not the court below was wrong in refusing the application on the ground mentioned above. Section 67 of the Indian Companies Act, VI of 1882, (which was in force at the time), provides for the