Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Cantonment Board and ors. Vs. Jagat Paul Singh Cheema

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ60

possess any power to set aside the decision of the Board and all that it possessed under the Cantonments Act was the power to direct the Board to consider or reconsider the matter.4. The Cantonment Board has filed … the learned Single Judge was not countenanced by the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924. He refers to Section 52(2) of the Act to support his submission. According to the learned Counsel, the reference made by General Commanding-in-Chief

Ongole Tobacco Processing and Marketing Co-operative Society Vs. Gover ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 - Rule 52(1)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD787

objection application filed by petitioner to Registrar of Prakasam district where defaulter and property both are situated. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Andhra Pradesh, Agriculture and Co-operation (Co-op.I) Department dated 28-1-1999, as illegal and without jurisdiction and contrary to Rule 52(1) of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Rules, 1964 (for short the Rules).2. It is stated in the affidavit filed

Pfimex Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 226(2); Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 2 and 2(3); Rajasthan Improvement Act, 1959 - Sections 52(1, 2, 5 and 6)

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD52; 1998(3)AnWR426

satisfaction of Section 29 (4) (b) - Court found no reason to issue writ as prayed for. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … were residents of Calcutta. In accordance with the procedure contemplated under the said Act, initially a notice under Section 52(2) of the Act, was served on the owners calling upon them to submit their objections, if any, for

Kishore Karwankar Vs. Joint Commissioner, Regional Transport Authority ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR2003AP249; 2003(2)ALD280; 2003(1)ALT628

dismissed as neither consideration of public interest nor specific provision of legislation permitted such liberty to petitioner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on any fuel of his choice, unless prohibited by any legislation. It is further contended that inasmuch as Section 52 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short 'the Act') has been amended by Act No.27 of 2000, which

Ganga Charan Vs. Bans Bahadur Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 27; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1975All25

as it is a suit in which rights of immovable property are directly and specifically in question. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a bona fide purchaser for value without notice and that in any case his defence was barred by Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. Consequently, he decreed the suit of the plaintiff. An appeal was preferred

State Vs. Chandra Bali Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45, 45(1), 46(1), 50 and 52; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1960All124; 1960CriLJ203

warning by Superintendent first day - cannot be punished for the same offence the next day also. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … learned Civil and Sessions Judge of Deoria, acquitting the respondents in each case of an offence punishable under Section 52 of the Prisons Act (Act IX of 1894). Chandrabali Singh is the respondent in Govt. Appeal No. 1599

Abdul Karim Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 11, 12 and 52; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC516

to hear the arguments on question of limitation and question of merits - appeal can be filed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the basis of reconciliation. Thereafter, de-notification under Section 52 of the Act took place on 15.2.1999. The petitioner filed appeal after the de-notification referred above on 16.4.1999.

Brij NaraIn Vs. Ram Dayal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 52(1)

Reported in : AIR1954All8

is made by accused under Article 227 - conviction is illegal and requires to be set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … takes the case out of the jurisdiction of the Adalati Panchayat the conviction of the applicant would be bad.Section 52 of the Panchayat Raj Act enumerates the various sections of the Indian Penal Code, offences under which are,

Ram Bharose and ors. Vs. Rampal Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1920All246; (1920)ILR42All319

of 1882, (Transfer of Property Act), Section 52--'Contentious suit'--Suit decided ox parte, but not fraudulent or collusive. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.