Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 51 · Page 1 of about 150 results (0.048 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 1906

Chheda Lal Vs. Parsotam Narain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-28-1906

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All76

Property Act), Sections 52, 86 and 87 - Lis pendens--Suit for foreclosure--Suit not terminated until decree absolute. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1991

Churk Cement Mazdoor Sangh, Churk and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-22-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19, 19(6), 38, 39, 43-A, 125, 226 and 311; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 30-B

Reported in : AIR1992All88

- held, arrived at by the Government bonafide - Court cannot sit in judgement over it . - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … writ petitions call in question the validity and legality of the sale by Government of U. P. of 51% shares in a wholly Government owned public sector Corporation, U. P. State Cement Corporation Ltd. (UPSCCL) in favour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 2003

K. Agi Reddy Vs. Uppal Kalan Municipal Council and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-26-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 51(5)

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD517; 2004(2)ALT279

not complied while suspending petitioner - held, suspension Order cannot sustained and liable to be set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was suspended by the impugned proceedings dated 29-11-2003 for a period of two months under Sub-section (5) of Section 51 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 (for short 'the Act'). Questioning the same the present writ petition is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 14 1957

Hakim Mohammad Illayas Khan Vs. Sahab Collector Bahadur (Aligarh)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-14-1957

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1958All24

to an end only after satisfaction of decree - sale during execution attracts doctrine of lis pendens. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1960

Mathura Datt Bhatt Vs. Prem Ballabh Khulba

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-03-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 51; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 48; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 88

Reported in : AIR1961All19

regard to every transaction and act of his - held, decree against the accounting partner not enforceable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … for accounts of a dissolved partnership which had existed between the parties to the decree. The decree-holder invoked Section 51 C.P.C. and alleged that the decree was for a sum for which the judgment debtor was bound, in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 2002

Muppidi Dora Reddy Vs. Bollareddy Ramakrishna Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-31-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 21, Rules 64, 96, 98, 100 and 102; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR2003AP299

alleged was subsequent to filling of suit so hit by Rule 102 and doctrine of lis pendens. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1955

Gobardhan Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 51; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 - Sections 60

Reported in : AIR1959All53

not supported by any data - no adequate proof that liquor was illicit - conviction set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was an expert in his own department and was able to distinguish liquors but the court should under Section 51 ascertain the grounds on which his opinion was based so as to test it. 6. In this case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1993

Abdul Aziz and Others Vs. District Judge, Rampur and Anothers

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-15-1993

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 115; Transfer of property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1994All167; MANU/UP/0029/1994

- according to doctrine of lis pendens both parties bound by decree - raised objection not sustainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2003

D.N. Elumalai and ors. Vs. M. Chinnaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-09-2003

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Land Acquisition Act; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2004AP230; 2004(1)ALD873

revenue officials not required - held, dismissal of application in context of Article 227 legal and justified. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2002

Mazhar Sultana Vs. Mohd. Abdul Majeed

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24; Guardians and Wards Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD119; 2003(1)ALT68

filed by husband - wife's convenience given preference - matter transferred to place of residence of wife. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial