Advanced Search Results

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section 5 of the 1955 Act provides that the Corporation shall consist of such number of elected members as may

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … nominations made for the purpose of reconstituting the Board. Section 60 of the present Act correspondents to Section 54 of the b1 repealed Act. Section 54 of the Repealed Act reads as hereunder:54. SUPERSESSION OF BOARD:--(1) If,

Karansingh S/O Kachrusingh Kakas Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Cant ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rule 5 and 5(1)

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR219; 2008(3)BomCR59; 2008(3)MhLj891

published a draft of Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 31 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The Cantonment Board has also published a draft for division of cantonment into wards on the notice board … forthwith by mutual consent and taken for final hearing. 2. A very short question of interpretation of Rule 5 of the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007, arises for our consideration in this writ petition.3. Petitioner is resident of

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act'). … judgment in Rita, J. Verghese v. Vidya Mandir 2002 (3) MH LJ 57 took the view that the expression 'private school' has to be read

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to … Petition challenging the voters list was not maintainable. He relied upon Rule 54 which provides for an election to be challenged only by way of

Ramesh Chouksey Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT48

of 1951 is not applicable to elections to the Cantonment Board and that only the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act of 2006') and the Rules of 2007 are applicable.11. Sub-section (1) of Section 29 … the provision in the special law contained in Sub-rule (7) of Rule 13 of the Rules of 2007, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning delay in filing an objection filed beyond the period of twenty

Vikrampuri Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. Vs. Secunderabad C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 340 and 343

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD494; 2007(3)ALT192

WPMP Nos. 34100 and 34101 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are also dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a huge commercial complex and that too in complete violation of the sanctioned plan. In paragraphs 4 and 5 of his affidavit, Shri W.V. Ramana has given the details of the so-called violation of the sanctioned plan.

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

wall are blocking the existing road which is impermissible in law keeping in view Sec. 258 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The petitioners thereafter served notices to the respondents requesting them to stop construction of the boundary wall and … encro unauthorised constructions. 3.1.7 C. That land, management of which is vested Municipal or other public purposes, under section 108 of the Cantts (Section 122 of the Act of 2006). This category of land is not taken … India along with Brigadier Prakash Chandra, Station Commander and perused the record. 5. In the present case, the petitioner No.1 is a retired Major and

Mahesh Jain vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

with the initiation of proceedings under Section 5B of the PP Act, proceedings under Section 248 of the Cantonments Act, 2006, also for demolition of unauthorised construction were also initiated; (iv) orders dated 31st July, 2012, 8th August, 2012 … Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. of dismissal of the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 5th November, 2012 of the respondent no.2, being the Estate Officer of the respondent no.1, in exercise of powers

Rajbir Singh vs.commissioner of Police & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No.2 for unauthorised construction and notice against the respondent No.2 was framed under Section 247 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 wherein he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to fine to the tune of ₹10,000/- and cost towards demolition … counsel for the petitioner further contends that W.P.(Crl.) No.2634/2016 Page 1 of 5 on the bare reading of the FIR, it is not evident that … FIR was registered as a counterblast to the action taken by the petitioner of issuing notice to the Cantonment Board on 26th October, 2015 asking them to take action against the unauthorized construction done by respondent No.2