Advanced Search Results

The Union Of India Vs. Bangalore North Taluk Public Greivances Committ ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

together with a report of any unauthorized structures or encroachment there on. 45 Section 3 of the Cantonment Act, 2006, is as under: “3. Definition of cantonments.- (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, … the case of Sulochana Chandrakant Galandi Vs. Pune Municipal Transport and others - (2010) 8 Supreme Court Cases 467. 4261. The respondent-plaintiffs relied upon the decision in the case of Dr. Nitin G. Khot and others Vs.

Sri Krishna Tulasi Chit Fund (P.) Ltd. Vs. Renuka Traders

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 11

Reported in : [2004]50SCL470(AP)

to applicant balance due amount after adjustment - held, respondent jointly and severally to pay decretal amount. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Receipt Nos. 16119 and 16120 was adjusted towards Chit No. 18 of Chit Group KLT-2A and Chit No. 46 of the same Chit Group respectively. That respondent No. 1 is still due to the applicant a sum

Narendra Bahadur Singh Vs. Chief Inspector of Stamps, U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(10), 2(14) and 2(17) - Schedule - Articles 40 and 46; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 40 and 45 to 48

Reported in : AIR1972All1

shares in lieu of cash compensation - not a conveyance but mortgage - chargeable to stamp duty. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … firm to the 4th partner.6. The position of partners on dissolution of a firm may be examined. Under Section 46, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, on the dissolution of the firm, every partner is entitled, as against all the

S. Fazeelath Begum Vs. K. Abdul Hakeem (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules - Rules 46, 47 and 49; Andhra Pradesh Government Life Insurance Fund Rules - Rule 31

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD647; 2004(2)ALT331

Muslim law of succession applicable - held, heirs of deceased entitled to have succession certificate regarding same. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is entitled to APGLI Fund of the deceased. I am not able to accept the said contention. Rule 46 (5) of the A.P. Pension Rules reads:'For the purpose of this rule and Rules 47, 48 and 49

South Central Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Employees ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesService

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 30 and 116B; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 46, 141 and 335

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD687

- petitioners reverted back without referring resolution - unjustifiable - constructive res judicata not applicable to resolution. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Court also, being an organ of the State, in keeping with the Directive Principle laid down in Article 46 of the Constitution to promote with special care, the educational and economic interest of the Scheduled Castes and

Gopi Nath Vs. Satish Chandra

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialLimitation

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 46; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 6 and 7 - Article 106; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 157; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 88

Reported in : AIR1964All53

was partner of a firm - surviving members are entitled to file suit for rendition of account. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … cannot take partin the management of the partnership and theycannot file a suit for dissolution of the partnership.Under Section 46 of the Indian PartnershipAct of 1932 on the dissolution of a firm everypartner or his representative is entitled

S. Manohar Reddy Vs. G. Koteswara Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 4, 31, 32, 46 and 47

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD567; 2004(4)ALT69

of Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - held, matter to be disposed of as directed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 2002 and the writ petitions are accordingly closed. Service - basis of promotion - Rules 4, 31, 32, 46 and 47 of Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Government Order challenged on ground that promotion

Mul Chand Vs. Murari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1914All212; (1914)ILR36All8

XXI, Rule 58--Insolvency--Property taken by receiver as property of insolvent--Objection by third party claming to be owner--Procedure--Appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … this appeal as a matter of right and without any reference to the provisions of Sections 22 and 46 of the Provincial Insolvency Act on the subject of appeals. An examination of these sections, however, suggests two

N. Laxman Dev Vs. Nagarjuna Constructions Engineer and Builders and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 115(1) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD208; 2003(1)ALT730

(c) are satisfied amendment did not result in any perceptible alteration in revisional jurisdiction of High Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 115 of C.P.C., which is incorporated by way of Amendment Act 46 of 1999, unless the orders passed by the Court below is in the nature of disposing of the

Rajive Raturi versus Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.970; 2024 INSC 858

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … providing essential services such as all primary health centres, civil hospitals, schools, railway stations and bus stops. 58. Section 46 pertains to the time limit for compliance with the accessibility rules by service providers. It stipulates that all