Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 44 · Page 1 of about 137 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 2014

People's Movement for Civic Action through Its General Secretary, Patr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Feb-26-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the VP that the construction was not made by respondent No.6 until 2006 or even later. Hence the initial sanction/approval/permission/licence of 31st May, 1995 has … and licence of the Chief Town Planner of the Town and Country Planning Department, respondent No.4, (TP) under Section 44 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (TP Act) and the Village Panchayat Curea, Bambolim and Talaolim, … upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay Vs. Cantonment Board and Ors., Pune being SLP No. 647 of 1992 Jt 1992(4) SC 538 with other matters in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2007

Hotel Asoka Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer-1, Dept of Comml. Taxes

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-28-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 1(2), 3, 5B, 5(2), 6(2), 7 and 30; Kerala Finance Act, 2006 - Sections 2(1); KVAT Act, 2003 - Sections 8; Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17 and 17(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 226 and 265; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 30

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ419; (2009)25VST546(Ker)

other places.6. The Kerala Finance Bill, 2006 was passed by the Kerala State Legislature as 'The Kerala Finance Act, 2006, (Act 22 of 2006) on 19-10-2006. The Act received the assent of the Governor on 24-10-2006 and was … his power under Section 3 of the act has issued circular No. 44/2006 dated 27th November 2006 to all the authorities under the act, for … those situated within One hundred and the are of a municipal corporation forty percentor municipal council or a cantonment(b) in the case of those situated in any One hundred and other place thirty five percent.4. Section 7

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1951

Jagat Bus Service Vs. State Transport Authority and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-24-1951

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 44(2)

Reported in : AIR1952All74

and for building confidence of public in Tribunal their appointment as members of Tribunal is not advisable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … financial interest whether as a proprietor or employee or otherwise in any transport undertaking within the meaning of Section 44 (2). They left that question as an open question which might require consideration at a later stage. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 10 1964

Smt. Chaboo Devi Vs. Pt. Ram Sarup and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-10-1964

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 10(2); Allahabad High Court Orders; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 and 122 - Order 44, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1965All79

memorandum of appeal must be 'duly stamped'- provision of Court-fees Act prevail over Code of Civil Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Desai, C.J.1. This is an application purporting to be under Order 44 Rule 1 C. P. C. for permission to file in forma pauperis a Special Appeal from a judgment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2002

A. Gopala Reddi Vs. E. Jayarami Reddi (Died) by Lrs.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-22-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD112

firm dissolved with effect from 31.03.1982 and accounts to be rendered for period from 19.04.1979 to 31.03.1982. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of P.W.1 and came to the conclusion that the plaintiff's claim for dissolution comes within the ingredients of Section 44 of the Act and decreed the suit directing that the firm is deemed to have been dissolved with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2002

international Investor Kcsc Vs. Sanghi Polyesters Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-09-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 31(7), 44, 48 and 48(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 41

Reported in : 2003(1)ALT364; [2003]43SCL271(AP)

Court - anount received by respondent can be allowed to be recoverable in original currency of award. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … by the New York Convention. For the purpose of Chapter I, the expression 'foreign award' is defined under Section 44 of the Arbitration Act. Section 44 reads as follows : '44. Definition - In this chapter, unless the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Ram Udit Pande and anr. Vs. Ambika Dat

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All274

- Misjoinder--Cause of action--Pre-emption--Zamindari and appurtenant sir-land sold by separate deeds--Suit to pre-empt both zamindari and sir. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … before us, on the ground that the claim as brought, without any leave of the Court obtained under Section 44, was bad for misjoinder of causes of action. The suit was a suit for the recovery of immoveable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2001

Ch. Prabhakar and 2 ors. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Its Principal ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-08-2001

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 5, 5(3), 12, 39, 39A and 44; Indian Electricity (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 39, 49B, 49C, 49C(3), 49C(4), 49C(5), 49C(7), 49F and 49G; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Madras Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1954; Madras Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1949; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 6A; Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1974; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 21 and 285; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 260, 262, 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116 and 379

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT694

of 1910 amended in 2000 - amendments did not operate retrospectively - held, amended Act not applicable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … facing criminal prosecution for alleged commission of offence of theft of electric energy punishable under sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, (for short 'the Act') in pursuance of a complaint lodged by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2002

Akula Narayana Flour, Rice and Oil Mill and Three ors. Vs. the State o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-2002

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39, 44, and 49A

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)665; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)65

prior to amendment need not be tried by Tribunal - held, case to be tried by Magistrate. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Vigilance, and A.P.T.C., Sangareddy, Medak District registered a case in Crime No. 54 of 1995 under Sections 39, 44, and 49A of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and after investigation, filed a charge sheet against the petitioners in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1902

Dhapo Vs. Bansi Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-05-1902

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All242

or collusion--Custom--Saraogis--Alleged custom of exclusion of daughters from inheritance to their fathers set ups but not proved. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … operation of it--Bansi Lal v. Ramji Lal (1898) I.L.R. 20 All. 370. In that case the provisions of Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act were not brought to the notice of the learned Judges who decided it,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial