Advanced Search Results

Bansraj Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 42, 42(1), 123, 123(1) and 123(11); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1956All27; 1956CriLJ6

punishes only the owner whether he himself drives or cause it to be driven by the driver. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … by the Sessions Judge, Gorakhpur, recommending that the conviction of the applicant Bansraj under Section 123 read with Section 42 of the Motor Vehicle Act be set aside. The prosecution case is that Bansraj, a driver, was found

Singarasu Venkayamma Vs. State, Excise Inspector, Chirala Excise Range

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 17 and 42

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD(Cri)935; 1999(4)ALT7; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)144; 2000(70)ECC631

writing -- Even the Inspector was not aware of the procedure to be followed under the Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the quantity. Witness No. l also states that search was conducted by a Constable and in accordance with Section 42 of N.D.P.S. Act search can be conducted by an Officer who is superior in rank to a peon,

Vallapareddy Sumitra Reddy and anr. Vs. Kasireddy Laxminarayana Reddy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rule 1; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 42

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD642; 2002(6)ALT645

suit not barred by Order 2 Rule 2 - appeal dismissed - Order of Single Judge affirmed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … concerned, their Lordships were pleased to hold that nothing is given subject to the contract between the parties. Section 42 of the Partnership Act reads as under: '42. Subject to contract between the partners a firm is dissolved-

Pothireddi Sivaprasada Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2001(76)ECC760

Section 42 is not applicable, the question of violation of Section 50 would not arise.;Appeal is dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mst. Govindi Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 1 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31(2), 31(4), 68, 246, 254(2), 382 and 389

Reported in : AIR1952All88

compensation in form of Bonds - Act not invalid on ground that no compensation is provided for. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to acquisition of property, if there had been an enactment laying down principles of cash payment under entry 42 of list III; and as the principles of payment of compensation laid down in the impugned Act are

Vara Vara Chits Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Y. Punyavathi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 40 and 42

Reported in : 2004(4)ALD41; 2003(6)ALT94; [2004]49SCL548(AP)

deemed to have been terminated - held, same rule applies to prized subscribers with regard to dividend. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … agreement. In view of the said provision, the chit in this case is deemed to have been terminated. Section 42 deals with the refund of money to the non-prized subscribers. According to the said section, a chit is

Ram Manorath Singh and ors. Vs. Dilraji Kunwari

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1914All169; (1914)ILR36All146

the joint property under a family arrangement--Suit for declaration of rights of other members of the family. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … possession at all, and that no suit for a declaration could Ho in view of the provisions of Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act. The court below went solely into the question of the actual possession. It

A. Gopala Reddi Vs. E. Jayarami Reddi (Died) by Lrs.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD112

firm dissolved with effect from 31.03.1982 and accounts to be rendered for period from 19.04.1979 to 31.03.1982. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … (g) on any other ground which renders it just and equitable that the Firm should be dissolved. 15. Section 42 of the Act, inter alia, provides that if a Firm is constituted for a fixed term, the same

Maharaj Kumar Mahmud Hasan Khan Vs. Moti Lal Banker

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38, 42 and 47 - Order 20, Rule 11(2) - Order 21, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rules 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1961All1

- held, undertaking of the judgment debtor to accept the increased liability will not make any difference. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … by the Court which passed it or by the Court to which it is sent for execution and Section 42 provides that the Court executing a decree sent to it 'shall have the same powers in executing such

Emperor Vs. Joti Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1920)ILR42All314

Penal Code), Section 187--Omission to give assistance to the police--Extent of power of police to require assistance. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to render or offer. Whatever obligation lay upon these persons under the law is defined and limited by Section 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. According to that section, as applied to the facts of this case,