Advanced Search Results

Vuppala Nagalingam and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40

Reported in : [1999]237ITR16(AP)

in present case as payment was not in capacity as a partner Section 40 (b) not applicable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Ram Asrey Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Allahabad Rules of Court, 1952 - Rule 5; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(2), 6, 17(4) and 40

Reported in : AIR1967All4

conducted even before notification under Section 4 - such enquiry will not effect scope of Section 4. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was issued on 2-4-1960 (published in the Gazette of 9-4-1960), followed by another notification dated 4-4 1960 under Section 40(2) of the Act, appointing the S. D O., (II) of Bareilly to hold the inquiry that is necessary

Abdul Latif Nomani Vs. Commissioner Gorakhpur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 40(1), 40(4), 40(6), 48, 87A, 113(1), 113(2) and 303; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 4(28); Constitution of India - Article - 226

Reported in : AIR1968All44

- members on whom remedy lay in suit should have denied upon the petition under Article 226. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was made mala fide but he held that the order of removal did not satisfy the provisions of Section 40(1)(a) of the U. P Municipalities Act and was, therefore, invalid En passant he observed that Sanaullah Sardar and

Sri S.A. Jawwad and ors. Vs. Smt. Maqsood Jahan Begum and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1978All73

where receiver failed to obtain permission of Court - not sufficient ground to remove him from receivership. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the disposal of the appeal.4. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 moved the application for appointment of Receiver under Order 40, Rule 1 C.P.C. which was allowed by the then Civil Judge by his order dated 20-9-1973 which may

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. A.M. Constructions

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32; Income Tax Rules, 1962

Reported in : [1999]238ITR775(AP)

tippers are also used for agricultural operations - held, assessee entitled to depreciation at rate of 40%. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Kanaka Durga Boatmen and Sand Quarry Workers Labour Contract Co-operat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD274

auction - grant of tender to sixth respondent invalid - ferry rights to be granted to petitioner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … hand over the ferry to the petitioner duly executing the agreement, on condition that the petitioner shall deposit 40% of the bid amount. The 4th respondent issued consequential proceedings dated 0-7-2002 granting time up to 9-8-2002 to

indwell Constructions Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30 to 43D and 145

Reported in : (1999)151CTR(AP)207; [1998]232ITR776(AP)

Applicable to current assessment year as well. Income Tax Act 1961 s.143(3) Income Tax Act 1961 s.145 - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that in the case of a firm which has borrowed capital from its own partners, the provisions of Section 40(b) apply as it is regarded as payment of interest to oneself and such deduction has to be disallowed.

Purushottam Chandra Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 19, 40(3) and 178(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1959All26

elections - resulting in debar to contest elections - petitioner entitled to seek relief under Article 226. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the Municipal Board of Ghaziabad in October, 1958. In April, 1954, the State Government started proceedings under Section 40 Sub-sections (3) and (4) of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, for the removal of the appellant from

Shanti Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Nar Singh Das Bharg ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 9, 11, 12 and 40; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 7; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 199 and 200

Reported in : AIR1965All17

is to provide house accommodation to the needy public - held, acquisition to be for public purpose. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … learned single fudge held that the acquisition was not made for a public purpose within the meaning of Section 40 of the Act and consequently the proceedings for the acquisition of tbe land which was for a company

Gopi Kishan and ors. Vs. Dan Prasad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)ILR36All19

temporary injunction as to property in suit--Order putting each Party in possession of part pending the suit. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … portion. The order itself seems to us not ultra vires, but one covered by the provisions of order XL, Rule 1. It has been argued before us, however, that the effect of this order is to remove