Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 4 · Page 1 of about 1,714 results (0.061 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 13 2007

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-2007

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … exercise of powers conferred under Clause (b) of Sub-sections (1) & (4) of Section 13 of the Act 41 of 2006 the Central Government made a declaration to vary the constitution of Secunderabad Cantonment Board w.e.f. 18.12.2006

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2007

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … as of right is the moot question which arises for determination in this petition filed for striking down Section 4(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 (for short, 'the 2005 Act') and for issue of a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2020

The Union Of India Vs. Bangalore North Taluk Public Greivances Committ ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-06-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

together with a report of any unauthorized structures or encroachment there on. 45 Section 3 of the Cantonment Act, 2006, is as under: “3. Definition of cantonments.- (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, … of permanent injunction from imposing any kind of restrictions on the right of user of the disputed road 4 by the plaintiffs and the members of the public except in accordance with law. The prayer for mandatory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter-affidavit are not … is filed by the first respondent.Sri P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2014

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-05-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

wall are blocking the existing road which is impermissible in law keeping in view Sec. 258 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The petitioners thereafter served notices to the respondents requesting them to stop construction of the boundary wall and … encro unauthorised constructions. 3.1.7 C. That land, management of which is vested Municipal or other public purposes, under section 108 of the Cantts (Section 122 of the Act of 2006). This category of land is not taken … detailed reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 4 and it has been stated that the land in question which is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K.S. Ashok Kumar S/O. Late Sri K. Sailoo Vs. the Cantonment Execut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181(3), 181A, 194 and 194(2); Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD580

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter affidavit are … filed by the first respondent.3. Sri P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2007

Koppu Satyanarayana Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 122, 250 and 340; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD443

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to inform you, that, your above referred application cannot be considered as the Society has not handed over 40% common areas through Gift Deed as per layout byelaws.You are therefore advised to insist the Society for handing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2012

Smt Nazneen P. Bapooji Rep by Her Gpa Sr Vs. the Ceo, Secunderabad Can ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Cantonments Act 1924 ( for short "the 1924 Act" ) which was later repealed and replaced by the Cantonments Act, 2006( for short "the 2006 Act"). The grievance in all these writ petitions is against the action of the … assessment in respect of the properties of the petitioners in exercise of the powers conferred on him under Section 80 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 read with Sections 75 to 79 of the Act under separate notices … The District Magistrate or an Executive Magistrate iii) The Chief Executive Officer iv) The Health Officer Ex.Officio v) The Executive Engineer Ex. Officio vi) Three

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2022

Seema T.K., vs the Estate Officer(the Chief Executive Officer),

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-04-2022

revision petitioners extensively referred to the various provisions of the Public Premises Act as well as the Cantonment Act, 2006, to contend that, orders of the first respondent was malafide, illegal and legally not sustainable. It was contended … respondent. They requested to revoke the decision.11. It was thereafter revision petitioners were served with noticedated 06.04.2018 under section 4 of the Public Premises Act. It was replied by raising several objections. This resulted in the order dated … 670 006. BY ADV G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENT/S:1 THE ESTATE OFFICER(THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER), CANTONMENT BOARD, CANNANORE, HQ HOSPITAL P.O., KANNUR - 670 017. 2 THE CANTONMENT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2022

K.G.Philip, vs the Estate Officer(the Chief Executive Officer),

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-04-2022

revision petitioners extensively referred to the various provisions of the Public Premises Act as well as the Cantonment Act, 2006, to contend that, orders of the first respondent was malafide, illegal and legally not sustainable. It was contended … respondent. They requested to revoke the decision.11. It was thereafter revision petitioners were served with noticedated 06.04.2018 under section 4 of the Public Premises Act. It was replied by raising several objections. This resulted in the order dated … 670 006. BY ADV G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENT/S:1 THE ESTATE OFFICER(THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER), CANTONMENT BOARD, CANNANORE, HQ HOSPITAL P.O., KANNUR - 670 017. 2 THE CANTONMENT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial