Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 39 · Page 1 of about 229 results (0.052 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 13 1999

Committee of Management, Abdus Salam Muslim Girls Inter College, Bhatt ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-13-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 9(4), 16(G), 16(5), 16(6) and 16(7) - Regulations 39(1), 39(2), 39(3) and 100; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC37; (2000)1UPLBEC722

inoperative on expiry of 60 days of its inception - shall lapse and cannot remain in force. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … college, on the ground that requisite papers were not submitted within seven days under Section 16G and Regulation 39 (1) and (2) of Chapter III of the Regulation framed under the U.P. intermediate Education Act, 1921, 'the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1975

V.D. Tripathi and ors. Vs. Vijai Shanker Dwivedi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-17-1975

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2; Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 15; Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulations 29 and 39

Reported in : AIR1976All97

from exercising its power of suspension - held, revision allowed and order of Civil Judge set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Principal of the institution.3. During the pendency of the suit Vijai Shanker Dwivedi moved an application under Order 39, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Munsif and prayed for a temporary injunction restraining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2002

Nicholas Piramal India Limited Vs. Cultor Food Science Inc. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-01-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 47, Rule 1; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 45

Reported in : AIR2003AP254; 2003(1)ALT312

granting temporary injunction under Section 151 are same as those under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 2002

Gaddam Narsimha Vs. Puli Swamy and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rule 3A - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD66; 2003(3)ALT487

- confusion about survey number of land - held, Court to take custody and auction leasehold rights. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … No. 34 of 2001 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Jangaon, filed under order 39 Rule 1 C.P.C. 2. Revision petitioner filed O.S. No. 34 of 2001 on the file of the Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2003

Ramesh Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-17-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 39; Army Rules, 1954

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC536

have been taken against them - held, the Allahabad High Court has fair jurisdiction on this matter. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was relinquished on 26.10.1996 and he was awarded punishment, 'severe reprimand' and 14 days pay as fine under Section 39(a) of the Army Act. He was discharged from service on 31.8.1997 on the ground of his medical category

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1977

S.D. Saigal Vs. Smt. Vidya Vijan

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-1977

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 5

Reported in : AIR1978All82

not available to tenant who is party to suit for eviction under U.P. Act 3 of 1947. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was contended, as it has been contended before me, that the defendant-applicant was entitled to the benefit of Section 39 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 and since he had made

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1991

Churk Cement Mazdoor Sangh, Churk and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-22-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19, 19(6), 38, 39, 43-A, 125, 226 and 311; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 30-B

Reported in : AIR1992All88

- held, arrived at by the Government bonafide - Court cannot sit in judgement over it . - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … According to the company's own publication, production in the year 1985-86, 86-87, 87-88 and 88-89 has been 42.54, 39.45 and 44.92 and..... per cent respectively. According to the Corporation, the wet process employed in the Churk Factory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1999

State Bank of India, Jeedimetla Vs. Ind. Bank Merchant Banking Service ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-20-1999

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 38, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 10

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD734; 1999(6)ALT426

prove its interest in suit not could establish that rentals deposited pertains to amounts against bills discounted. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in an amount of Rs.1,80,46,266/-. In that suit the 1st respondent filed IA No.1866 of 1997 under Order 39 Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code (for short the Code) seeking a direction from the Court to respondents

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2001

Ch. Prabhakar and 2 ors. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Its Principal ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-08-2001

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 5, 5(3), 12, 39, 39A and 44; Indian Electricity (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 39, 49B, 49C, 49C(3), 49C(4), 49C(5), 49C(7), 49F and 49G; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Madras Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1954; Madras Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1949; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 6A; Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1974; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 21 and 285; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 260, 262, 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116 and 379

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT694

of 1910 amended in 2000 - amendments did not operate retrospectively - held, amended Act not applicable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. In this Writ Petition, the applicability of Section 39 of Indian Electricity Act as amended by the Indian Electricity (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000 is in question.2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2001

Chennamsetty Rama Murthy Vs. Gattu Venkateswarlu and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD383; 2001(2)ALT317

to support their respective claims - Court remitted matter to Lower Court for fresh disposal of same. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … originally arrayed in the suit as well as the concomitant petition filed in I.A.No.70 of 1997 under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The facts lie in a narrow compass: The petitioner-plaintiff

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial