Advanced Search Results

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … apart, as rightly contended by the learned Counsel for the respondents, in view of the savings clause under Section 360(2) of the Act 41 of 2006 the notification in which the elected Board was notified under the repealed

Cantonment Board,meerut . Vs. Afzal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

originally governed by the 1924 Act. The said Act is repealed by virtue of Section 360 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short, ‘the 2006 Act’). The 2006 Act came into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006.4. Before the new Act has

Smt Nazneen P. Bapooji Rep by Her Gpa Sr Vs. the Ceo, Secunderabad Can ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Cantonments Act 1924 ( for short "the 1924 Act" ) which was later repealed and replaced by the Cantonments Act, 2006( for short "the 2006 Act"). The grievance in all these writ petitions is against the action of the … the petitioners is that the 2006 Act came into force on 13-9- 2006, that as per clause (c) Section 360 of the said 2006 Act, all assessments made by the Board shall insofar as they are not inconsistent

S.L.Seth Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

be alleged against the respondent No.4. However, the respondent No.4 has contended that action was taken under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (herein after referred to as '2006 Act'). Similarly, the respondent No.5 by filing a separate return, has contended … only under the repealed provisions and not otherwise. Even otherwise 2006 Act contains the Repeals and Savings under Section 360 of the 2006 Act, which protects the application, the notice of erection of building submitted by the petitioners.

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Aviation, Government of India, in exercise of powers conferred under the provisions of Section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1934, to regulate construction for the safety of aircraft operations. Prior to the said notification, similar notification relating

Deoman Upadhyaya Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 27, 161, 162 and 162(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR1960All1; 1960CriLJ1

principles of Article 14 -Section 162 (2) as much it relates to Section 27 also becomes void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … (1912) 229 US 322: 57 Law Ed 1206. In Rosenthal v. People of New York, (1912) 226 US 360: 57'. Law Ed 212, the failure of the legislature to extend the protection of an Act to other

Ram Nandan and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 260, 403 and 530; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR1959All11

in summary trial not bar under Section 403 for fresh trial of accused for the same offence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the applicants on a case reported in Emperor v. Dulla, ILR 45 All 58: (AIR 1923 All 360) (A). But that case has not been relied upon here as it appears to be clearly distinguishable. In

G.S. Chooramani and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Government Estates Thekedari Abolition Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 31(2), 31A and 226; Government Grants Act, 1895; Government Grants (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1969All43

and impugned notification challenged - notification abolishes lease - held, the impugned notification deserves to be quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … will be upheld notwithstanding that the rest has become unenforceable. Vide Cooley's Constitutional Limitations, Vol. 1, at pp. 360-361; Craw-ford on Statutory Construction, pages 217-218.3. Even when the provisions which are valid are distinct and separate from

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

was made by the Assessing Officer, having regard to retrospective amendment to Section 92CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act, 2012.2. Whether AMP Expenses incurred by the assessee in India can be treated and … Pvt. Ltd / Sony Mobile Communication India Pvt. Ltd. Now known as, Sony India Ltd. Discovery Communications India 2006-07 2008-09 521/2013 92/2014 Canon India Pvt. Ltd Daikin Air Conditioning (India) Pvt. Ltd 132/2014 214/2014 2007-08 2008-09 2006-07