Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 36 · Page 1 of about 203 results (0.054 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 11 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2002

isra Fatima Vs. Bismillah Begum and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-06-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 36

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD660; 2006(4)ALT216

Matched in: Citation 2002(5)ALD660; 2006(4)ALT216

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1952

Bhagwan DIn Vs. Ram Das and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-21-1952

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 3(18), 35, 36 and 37

Reported in : AIR1953All48

of the statutory tenant would be entitled to claim possession of the land from the daughter's son. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of 1939. If Section 37 is applicable, the plaintiffs have clearly no case. If, on the other hand, Section 36 is applicable, then as the next reversioners of Binda they became entitled to claim the property.3. Section 35,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 18 2002

indur Finance Corporation and Partnership Firm Vs. Gopal and Company a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-18-2002

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 9, 36, 43 and 118

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas981(AP)

are liable to pay amounts due under cheques in view of various clear legal provisions under Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … believe that any defect existed in the title of the person from whom he derived his title. 31. Section 36 of the Act dealing with the liability of prior parties to holder in due course says that every

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1991

Jagdish Saran Singhal Vs. the Collector, Hamirpur and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-31-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 35, 36, 36(2) and 37

Reported in : AIR1992All40; (1991)2UPLBEC1092

seeking reference cannot be rejected on the ground that petitioner was already granted compensation for the land. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … agreed with the State and the appeal was allowed directing the court below to reconsider the reference under Section 36 and determine compensation only in respect of the loss caused to the owner due to its non-occupation and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1916

Muhammad Habib-ullah Vs. Mushtaq HusaIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-1916

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1917)ILR39All95

of 1917 (Provincial Insolvency Act), Section 36 - Insolvent Transfer of property by insolvent--Validity of such transfer. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1970

ShamsuddIn Vs. Abbas Ali

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-19-1970

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rules 35, 35(1), 35(2), 36 and 100

Reported in : AIR1971All117

- possession under rule 36 is given when somebody else other than judgment debtor is in possession. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2001

S. Ratnamma Alias S. Raheema Bee Vs. S. Shiva Prasad and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2001

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33(4) and 36(2)

Reported in : AIR2002AP111

petitioner - held, rejection of nomination papers due to discrepancy in name in papers and electoral roll. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the petitioner is that the 9th respondent should have given opportunity to the petitioner as contemplated by Section 36(5) of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 (the Act), to prove her contention that Ratnamma and Raheema Bee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2004

irrigation Development Employees Association and ors. Vs. Government o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2004

Subject : CompanyService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14, 16(4), 162 and 226; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 29(1), 36(1), 291 and 291(1); Administrative Law; Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD599; 2004(3)ALT17; (2004)IILLJ581AP; [2004]55SCL459(AP)

caste and tribe - held, benefits available to scheduled caste not extended to members of backward class. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … company under Section 29(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, are subject to the provisions of the Act.19. Section 36(1) of the Companies Act provides that the memorandum and articles shall, when registered, bind the company and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2002

Radhakrishna Rice Mill Company and ors. Vs. Jumma Maseedh by Its Mutha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 15, 15(1), 29, 42, 44, 69 and 69(1); Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 32, 36, 42 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 93

Reported in : AIR2003AP70; 2002(6)ALD52; 2002(6)ALT791

wakf board have no power to grant lease beyond period - continuance of tenant beyond period illegal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the property of the Mosque is to be in accordance with the provisions of both the Acts. Under Section 36(f) of 1954 Act, lease or sublease of any Wakf property for any period exceeding three years shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial