Advanced Search Results

Haidar Shah Vs. Jamna Das and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All157

not competent to make payment of costs a condition precedent to the granting of permission to withdraw. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Knox and Aikman, JJ.1. This order (i.e., that under the last clause of Section 359 of the Code of Civil Procedure), it is hardly necessary to point out, was certainly not one in

Swanston Multiplex Cinemas P. Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationOther Taxes

Acts : Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1983 ; Bombay Entertainment (Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 3(13); Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(12), 3(13), 4, 5, 6, 6(3), 9B, 10A, 12, 13 and 22; Bombay Entertainment (Amendment) Act, 2005; Bombay Entertainments Duty (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 366(28)

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR580; 2009(2)BomCR298; (2008)110BOMLR3667; 2008BusLR61(Bom)

the Proprietor within the city limits of Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation is 45% and for other Municipal Corporations and Cantonments the rate of Entertainment Duty is 40% and the other areas have a rate as prescribed under the … time and the last been amended by the Maharashtra Act, 16 of 2006 which has come into effect on 04.05.2006. Section 3 of the said … Further, they have sought declaration that the Circular Exhibit - L is ultra virus the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1983 and seek to quash and set aside the same or such portion thereof including Clause 3.2 (e)

V. Muralidhar Vs. S. Anjaiah Goud and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 107, 108 and 111; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR2007AP347; 2007(5)ALD559; 2007(6)ALT779

petition to vacate the interim injunction granted in SAMP No. 3040 of 2006, which contain the name of Frontline Advertisers, i.e., the name in which … Tiles and Building Products v. B. Sudarshan and Ors. 1993 (3) ALT 359, the Courts below were in error in dismissing the suit. He also … in possession of the hoardings. I have been paying the necessary charges for display of hoardings to the Cantonment Board.(Underlining mine)I wonder why the trial Court omitted the important words 'it is not true to say' and … lessee of the suit space, the said finding, in view of Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 read with Section 17(d) of the Registration Act, 1908 which mandate any lease for a period exceeding

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment. 359) The children if come in contact with hardened criminals in jail, it … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

K.K.Remani vs State Information Officer, Kerala, Tvm.

Court : Kerala

theSupreme Court in Union of India v. Namit Sharma [(2013) 10 SCC 359], State of Manipur and another v. Chief Information Commissioner and another (2010 … Information Commissioner and another (2010 KHC 6538), also the judgment of the Delhi High Court in CPIO Delhi Cantonment Board v. Central Information Commission (WP(C)No.2847 of 2014), Chief Information Commissioner and another v. State of Manipur and … Ext.P1 orderpassed by the State Information Commissioner under Section 19(3) and Section 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), holding that the writ petitioner was responsible for a delay of

The Union of India (Uoi) Owning Southern Railway Represented by Chief ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 34

of vitiation clause before this Court by filing O.P. No. 315 of 2006. Both the petitions were dismissed by the order under appeals.6. We have … award.In U.P. Hotels v. U.P. State Electricity Board : (1989) 1 SCC 359, the Apex Court has observed as follows:If a specific question of law … O.S.A. No. 464 of 2009 is filed by South Western Railway represented by its Chief Engineer (CN)/Central, Bangalore Cantonment, Bangalore questioning the common order dated 8.6.2007 dismissing the original petitions filed by the appellants. The parties are … approached this Court by filing O.A. No. 535 of 2000 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and sought for an order of injunction restraining the railway administration from invoking the vitiation clause and