Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 358 · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 10 2015

T.P.Cherian Philip Vs. The National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-10-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

also claims W.A. No. 1665 of 2015 -:2. :- registration certificate under the Food Safety and Standards Authority Act, 2006. Petitioner claims that he is carrying on business in a place where there is no traffic and in … means a Municipal Corporation or a Municipal Council or a Nagar Panchayat, by whatever name called, or the Cantonment Board, or as the case may be, a civil area committee appointed under section 47 of the CantonmentAct, 1988, Central Government had entrusted the stretches from 349.000 km to 358.750 km (Vyttila-Aroor Section) of NH-47 to National Highways Authority of India. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 2004

B. Krishna Murthi, S/O Late Suraiah, Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-27-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Andhar Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 7 and 16; Service Rules - Rules 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 16; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 39

Reported in : 2005(2)ALT342

benefit.22. The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Revenue Members of the Special Court as was granted to such Revenue Members vide impugned G.O. Ms. No. 358, Revenue (Act & Rules) Department, dated 1-5-2004 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and offending Article 14 of the Constitution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2006

Boddu Satyavathi Vs. Boddu Ramakrishna Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-07-2006

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 20(2); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 7; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD591; 2007(3)ALT417

passed by the trial Court regarding the alternative relief stands. Each party shall bear their own costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … gave it to the plaintiffs father-in-law. After completion of the document the defendant demanded further payment of Rs. 358/- stating that he incurred the said expenditure for transplanting paddy on 5-6-1983 for which plaintiffs father-in-law did not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 30 2005

Suruvu Parshaiah Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A, 337 and 338; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 251 and 313

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD(Cri)806; 2006CriLJ824

bonds shall stand cancelled. The fine amount if any paid, shall be refunded to the revisied petitioner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … not disputed that there was head-on-collision between the bus bearing No. AP-10-E-1044 and the jeep bearing No. MH-l-F 358 in Padmanagar locality on the outskirts of Karimnagar town while the bus was going from Karimnagar to Sircilla

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1974

Shri Pratap NaraIn Vs. Juggilal Kamlapat Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-1974

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 106, 111 and 116; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR1975All73

been cleared - held, possession is to be given back as soon as appellant resigned the job. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … are: Ram Chandra v. Lala Dulichand : AIR1958All729 and Raj Narain v. Shiv Raj Saran, (1969 All LJ 358 at p. 362). In support of his contention. Counsel relied on the following cases:--Farooq Ahmad v. Muneshwar Bux

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1964

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 226 and 358; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1965All86; [1964]15STC505(All)

- also transaction in those canteens satisfy the connotation of sale and is liable to sales tax. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … urge that the Taxation Laws Amendment Act is void as it infringes Article 19 of the Constitution.30. Article 358 of the Constitution suspends the provisions of Article 19 of the Constitution while a proclamation of emergency is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1906

Bidhi Chand Vs. Kundan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-13-1906

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All64

Act No. V of 1882 (Easements Act), Section 4 - Easement--Right of privacy--Suit by occupier of house. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … In support of this plea reference is made to the case--Gokul Prasad v. Radho (1888) I.L.R., 10 All., 358. It is true that at page 387 of the judgment in that case, it is said that an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

committing other serious offences and unless there is no other appropriate response. 358) The Statement of Objects and Reasons of J.Act reveal that the Act … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2016

Dipti Sen and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

it has been averred that a piece of land having an area of 0.10 acres situated at Mouza Cantonment under Thana No. 157, Khata No. 84 (now 84/358), Plot No. 415 was purchased in the name of … one Hiyalal Singh vide registered sale deed no. 1821 dated 25.01.1971. Allegation has been made that by suppressing actual facts and by conniving with the scribe made false statement in the sale deed and 0.15 acre or … “M/s Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC India Ltd. & Ors.” reported in 2006(4) East Cr. C22(SC) as well as in the case of “Union of … the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh by which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C.3. A complaint case was instituted by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2023

Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Chief Quality Assurance Establishment

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-29-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

different in provisions of the kind from those existing acts/ employed in the notification viz., original building, wall, Cantonments Act, bank or other 2006, Air Craft Act, construction MoCA, 1934, Gazette Notification SO84E) (b) Within a second dated … immunity from the process of the Court could be claimed under Article 358, of the Constitution, since the order was not supported by any valid … CHAMBER ORDER DATED3108.2023. 3 ORDER S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV. J This Order has been divided into the following Sections to facilitate analysis: BRIEF FACTS4ANALYSIS10A. Works of Defence Act, 1903 occupies the field 10 B. Authorities relied upon

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial