Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 356 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 23 2003

Dr. K. Kesava Rao Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 174(2) and 356

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD509; 2004(2)ALT409

by Council of Ministers - none of the conditions satisfied - held, President rule cannot be imposed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … petitioner, there is breakdown of constitutional machinery in the State of A.P. and as such action under Article 356 of the Constitution of India should have been initiated by the President of India. Petitioner in his endeavour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1991

Arun Kumar Rai Chaudhary Vs. Union of India and Other

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-13-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 154, 163, 163(1), 164,164(1), 164(2), 226 and 356

Reported in : AIR1992All1

- Order for fresh election - no failure of Constitutional machinery - President rule must be rejected. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … present situation the President ought to have promulgated President Rule in the State of Uttar Pradesh under Art. 356 of the Constitution of India.5. After hearing the learned counsel we find that the argument advanced has no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2017

Maharaj Kumar Kaustouv Mani Pratap Shahi vs.the Chairman, Ndmc & A ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

before an order of demolition was passed by the respondent No.2/Board under Section 248 of the Delhi Cantonment Act, 2006 was a prerequisite. There is nothing in the language of Section 248 or any other provision in the … to his detriment, ought to be provided an opportunity of hearing so that he can defend himself [Refer: Cantonment Board, Dinapore & Ors. Vs. Taramani Devi, AIR1992SC61 Canara Bank vs. V.K. Awasthy; AIR2005SC2090and M/s Arcot Textile Mills

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 28 2016

S. Bala Krishna Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-2016

Subject : Education

during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force in a State, clause (b) will … factual matrix is that the 2nd respondent by name V.Jai Prakash is member of the 8th ward of cantonment area. The petitioner/accused is present Defence Estates Officer, Kolkota Circle, Kolkota, West Bengal and earlier worked as Chief … Magistrate, Secunderabad, who took cognizance of protest petition filed by the defacto-complainant for the offences u/sec.3(1)(X) of SCs/STs(POA) Act, 1989. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner so also the learned Public Prosecutor representing State-1st respondent … 1. This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, the CrPC') by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2013

Mohan Murti Vs. Deutsche Ranco Gmbh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-24-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

contract in German including the Merger has been provided which is notarized by a Swiss notary in the canton Basel-Stadt. It is stated therein that in Germany, it is settled law that the agreements on transfer of … period of 30 days and which period also cannot be extended inasmuch as Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to execution proceedings.3. Aggrieved by the said order of the learned Single Judge recalling

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 2008

John C.V. Alias John Peruvanthanam Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Kerala Forest (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile) Act, 2003; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Kerala Forest Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 27(1), 27(4) and 84; Prevention of Corruption Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 36, 154, 154(1), 154(3), 156(3), 190, 200, 203 and 482; The Kerala Forest (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile Land) Ordinance, 2000 - Sections 3(1) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1305

2007 (4) KLT 877 : 2008 Cri LJ 356 (SC) conceding to the officer-in-charge of a Police … speed post simultaneously to the Director General of Police, Commissioner of Police, Thiruva-nanthapuram City and Sub-Inspector of Police, Cantonment, Thiruvananthapuram is as follows:268.872 hectares (664.38 acres) of land called the Merchiston Estate comprised in various survey numbers … Ordinance 6 of 2000 which was subsequently replaced by the Kerala Forest (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile) Act, 2003 which was published on 8-6-2005 and which came into force with retrospective effect from 2-6-2000 that is, … Bihar : AIR2006SC3376 ; Ramesh Kumari v. State (NCT of Delhi) : 2006CriLJ1622 and Aleque Padamsee v. Union of India 2007 (3) KLT 1028 (SC) … Case : 1998CriLJ1 can treat the Writ Petition as one filed under Section 482, Cr. P. C. and direct the Station House Officer to register

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

be imposed for offences committed by persons below 18 years of age. 356) Aims of juvenile justice provide that the juvenile Justice system shall emphasize … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2026

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs Surender Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-2026

Subject : Labour and Industrial

entitled to 52 Sundays as rest; thus, the workman had worked for 356 days in the 12 months preceding his termination in March 2009. The … A gainful reference can also be made to the decision of the DivisionBench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. CGIT & Ors.5, where the Court held that in service law there is a difference between … Comm. (Health) Sh. Surender Kumar was allowed to join his duty w.e.f. 14.01.2009 subject to initiation of departmental action for wilful absence from his duty. The statement of misconduct was served upon Sh. Surender Kumar on 27.08.2009 … and if it is a simpliciter discharge, the same is violative of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. With the said observations, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial