Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 355 · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 17 2012

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-17-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

Kaur, AIR 2005 SC 534; R.M. Yellatti v. Assistant Executive Engineer AIR 2006 SC 355; and Pratap Singh & Anr. v. State of M.P., AIR … on the Will, which was liable to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue record before the trial Court, the … over the suit land illegally and in an unauthorised manner on 22.2.1993 and afterwards, thus the cause of action arose to approach the court.B. The defendant no.1/appellant filed the written statement denying the averments and ownership of … adverse inference was drawn against it in view of the provisions of Section 114 clause(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter called the Evidence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pai Foundation and Ors. vs. State of Karnataka and Ors., AIR 200.SC 355). 348) In Punjab State Electricity Board vs. Bassi Cold Storage, Khara and … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial