Advanced Search Results

Gopal Das Vs. Bihari Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All218

of bad faith'--Act of bad faith committed by applicant for declaration of insolvency antecedently to his application. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Gopal Das has appealed to this Court.2. It has been contended that the Court was not justified under Section 351 of the Code of Civil Procedure in rejecting the application of Babu Gopal Das, and could not for

Girwardhari and anr. Vs. Jai NaraIn and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.39

interpretation of--Latter part of Section 15(1) refers only to petitions by creditors--Object of Act III of 1907. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … proceedings were governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1882, for in dismissing the petition he refers to Section 351 of that Code. We must, however, consider whether the dismissal of the petition can be supported under the

Misri Lal and ors. Vs. Karim Bakhsh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All295

paid out of the estate. Insolvent judgment-debtor - Civil Procedure Code, Section 351(a)--Accidental false statements in application. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Paras Ram Vs. Karam Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All232

receiver--Vesting of insolvent's property in receiver--Objection to attachment--Jurisdiction to entertain objection--Civil Procedure Lode, Sections 278, 351, 354. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chandra Bhushan Misra Vs. Smt. Jayatri Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 7, 8, 96, 100, 121, 122, 127, 128 and 158 - Order 41, Rule 23; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859 - Sections 351; General Clauses Act

Reported in : AIR1969All142

Court - held, on ground of interest of justice appellant is entitled to refund of Court fee. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to be received, or if a suit is remanded in appeal on any of the grounds mentioned in Section 351 of the same Code for a second decision by the lower court, the appellate Court shall grant to

Durga Prasad Vs. Khairati and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All545

1859 (Civil Procedure Code), Sections 337, 351 - Act XXIII of 1861, Section 37--Appeal--Appellate Court, powers of. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

State of U.P. Vs. Chandra Gupta and Co.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70 and 74; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 56 and 115

Reported in : AIR1977All28

Limitation Act, 1908 - suit for recovery of refund money not the same as suit for compensation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a Division Bench of this Court in State of U. P. v. Suraj Prasad Gupta (First Appeal No. 351 of 1968, decided on 3-2-1976) (All), In this case also it was held that to a claim like

P.Vijaya Jyothi, D/Odr.P.Muralinath Red Vs. 1.The State of Andhra Prad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 , (2 of 1924 .) means that State Government.".10. As per the provisions of Section 5 of … Pleader for Revenue GIST: HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 2000(4) ALD5962. 1989 (1) ALT483. 1995 (2) A.P.L.J.325 4. 2006 (5) ALD132(DB) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.23634 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition, under

Km. Savitri Devi and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2240

person in employment of one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment and the Apex Court held that under the Cantonments Act, 1924 each of the Cantonment Boards is an independent autonomous body and the employees of one Cantonment Board … these indicia, in conjunction with other circumstances.13. In Jaya Bachchan v. Union of India and Ors. : JT 2006 (5) SC 414 : 2006 (3) AWC 2764 (SC) considering the question as to whether she was holding … General Officer Commanding-in-Chief v. Dr. Subhash Chandra Yadav : 1988 (2) SCC 351 and Om Prakash Rana v. Swarup Singh Tomar (supra) : 1986 (3) … '1986 Act') whereunder the petitioners admittedly have been given the aforesaid assignment.7. Section 10 of 1986 Act talks of the composition of the State Forum

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to, to the extent the legislature intended and not beyond the same. 351) In A.P. State Financial Corpn. (supra), this Court held that right to … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections