Advanced Search Results

T.P.Cherian Philip Vs. The National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

also claims W.A. No. 1665 of 2015 -:2. :- registration certificate under the Food Safety and Standards Authority Act, 2006. Petitioner claims that he is carrying on business in a place where there is no traffic and in … means a Municipal Corporation or a Municipal Council or a Nagar Panchayat, by whatever name called, or the Cantonment Board, or as the case may be, a civil area committee appointed under section 47 of the Cantonment … Authority of India Act, 1988, Central Government had entrusted the stretches from 349.000 km to 358.750 km (Vyttila-Aroor Section) of NH-47 to National Highways Authority

Thota Venkatanaramma and anr. Vs. Eruva Enna Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 35

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD810; 2005(1)ALT654

said to be erroneous and needs no interference.10. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Panchayat and is in possession and enjoyment of thereof and that in fact revision petitioners filed O.S. No. 349 of 1997 against him seeking a decree of perpetual injunction basing on the decree in O.S. No. 275

Enernorth Industries Inc. Vs. Vbc Ferro Alloys Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 434(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas130(AP)

Matched in: Citation [2006]133CompCas130(AP)

Someswara Cements and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Power Mak Industries and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2000)ICompLJ173(AP)

the same will have to be paid by the appellant. We make no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Petition No. 18 of 1998, Power Max Industries v. Someswara Cements and Chemicals Ltd. (1999) 4 Comp LJ 349 (AP)., seeking an order to wind up the company on the ground of failure of the appellant company

Dr. Jairaj Behari Vs. U.P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity Civil

Reported in : AIR1941All301

points referred to us is in the affirmative and we decide accordingly. Let the record be returned. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that has been cited before us is Municipal Committee, Amritsar v. Shankar Das (26) 13 A.I.R. 1926 Lah. 349. A learned single Judge of that Court in interpreting Section 22, Electricity Act, held that there was nothing

Connick Vs. Thompson

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

See, e.g. , Mass. Rule Prof. Conduct 1.1 and comment 6 (West 2006). Before Louisiana adopted continuing-education requirements, it imposed similar general competency requirements on … death. State v. Thompson , 516 So. 2d 349 (La. 1987). In the 14 years following Thompson’s … must amount to “deliberate indifference to the rights of persons with whom the [untrained employees] come into contact.” Canton v. Harris , 489 U. S. 378 , 388. Deliberate indifference in this context requires proof that city … was caused by “action pursuant to official municipal policy,” which includes the decisions of a government’s lawmakers, the acts of its policymaking officials, and practices so persistent and widespread as to practically have the force of law. … .” A municipality or other local government may be liable under this section if the governmental body itself “subjects” a person to a deprivation of

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

also: Mohan Karan vs. State of U.P. and Anr., AIR 199.SC 1601). 349) In RBI vs. Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd., and Ors. … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others versus State of Gujarat &am ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 332

Union Territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, means that State Government.”7. Section 10 of the ULC Act speaks of acquisition of vacant land inexcess … under Section 2(1) of the Act. The word “vested” has not been defined in the Act,[2026] 1 S.C.R. 349 Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others v. State of Gujarat & Others so also the word “absolutely”. What is