Advanced Search Results

Smt. Ram Rati and ors. Vs. Gram Samaj, Jehwa and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 348

Reported in : AIR1974All106

permission of settlement officer not required to transfer whole holding - English version prevails over Hindi version. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to the English version or to the Hindi version. For this purpose we have to turn to Article 348 of the Constitution. It is necessary to reproduce that Article. It enacts:--'348 (1) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing

Stowell, Manager Uncovenanted Service Bank Limited Vs. Billings

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All350

Sections 285-348 - Act XIV of 1859--Act IX of 1871--Compromise under decree--Execution--Limitation--Payments under compromise--Proceedings under barred decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mohan Mahavar and ors. and Vijay Kumar Mahavar and anr. Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT407

Jabalpur Cantonment Board.2. The relevant facts briefly are that the Cantonments Act, 1924 was replaced by a new Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the 2006 Act') by Parliament. The 2006 Act was brought into force by notification dated 18-12-2006. … short 'the 2006 Act') by Parliament. The 2006 Act was brought into force by notification dated 18-12-2006. Under Section 31 of the 2006 Act, the Central Government made and notified on 21-8-2007 the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 … submitted that the word 'resident' has been used in Sections 13(7), 65(1)(iv), 348(2) and 348(31) and the definition in Section 2(zt) is relevant for interpreting

Manu Bhai Tripathi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2008MP309; 2009(1)MPHT9

Sagar Cantonment Board.2. The relevant facts briefly are that the Cantonments Act, 1924 was replaced by the new Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short, 'the 2006 Act') by Parliament. The 2006 Act was brought into force by notification dated 18-12-2006. … short, 'the 2006 Act') by Parliament. The 2006 Act was brought into force by notification dated 18-12-2006. Under Section 31 of the 2006 Act, the Central Government made and notified on 21-8-2007 the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 … They submitted that the word 'resident' finds place in Sections 13(7), 65(1)(iv), 348(2) and 348(31) of the 2006 Act and it is for this reason

K.Soman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

accused 1 to 3 alone originally alleging offences under Sections 323, 331, 348 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code as … AS3D ACCUSED IN SC.NO.916/2012: -------------------------------------------------- K.SOMAN, S/O.KOCHAPPY, THOTTIVILA VEEDU, ADAYAMAN, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW RESIDING AT POLICE QUARTERS NO.G5 CANTONMENT HOUSE, VIKAS BHAVAN PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SMT.ASHA BABU SMT.AMMU CHARLES SRI.M.MANOJKUMAR (CHELAKKADAN) RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: … cases as, according to the Public Prosecutor, the conspiracy hatched in both the cases are same and the act of disappearance of evidence and creation of false documents to cover up the criminal act of accused 1 … Special Judge in Crl.M.P.No.58/2014 in SC.No.916/2012 and in Crl.M.P.No.59/2014 in SC.No.917/2012 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the

Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others versus State of Gujarat &am ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 332

Union Territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, means that State Government.”7. Section 10 of the ULC Act speaks of acquisition of vacant land inexcess … Repealing Act to the facts of this case. The appellants contended that without notice being delivered to them 348 [2026] 1 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reportsunder Section 10(5) of the ULC Act (since they were in actual possession

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Foundation and Ors. vs. State of Karnataka and Ors., AIR 200.SC 355). 348) In Punjab State Electricity Board vs. Bassi Cold Storage, Khara and Anr., … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections