Advanced Search Results

Mir Taher Ali Khan Vs. Chairman, A.P. Housing Board Through Competent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Mohammedan Law - Sections 347(1), 348, 349 and 350; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT674

interference with the findings recorded by the learned trial Judge. Hence the appeal is dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … could ill-afford to do.39. We can also not lose sight of the fact that under Sub-section (1) of Section 347 of Mohammaden Law, when a person governed by Muslim Law signifies his willingness to make to another, an

Puppala Seetaramaiah Vs. Superintendent, Sub-jail and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Limitation Act

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD584; 2003(4)ALT549; 2003CriLJ2978

moved to Court after expiry of period - held, no enquiry for ascertainment of compensation be commenced. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … prisoner's contribution for his own death.17. Recently in Orange v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, 2002 (QB) 347, after considering both the judgments Kirkham and Reeves (supra), where the prisoner committed suicide by hanging himself with

A. Narayan Rao Vs. Shanta Bai and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34 - Order 1, Rules 1 and 3; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 11(3) and 49

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD585; 2004(3)ALT104

a single suit - held, court fee to be paid off separately corresponding to cause of actions. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of Uttar Pradesh, 1964 (II) AWR 148 and Yerram Seshi Reddi v. Badduri Chandra Reddi, AIR 1957 AP 347, he contended the failure of the first appellate Court in keeping in view the necessary ingredients for awarding

Dr. Vijaypat Singhania and ors. Vs. Hari Shankar Singhania and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 20, 26, 33, 34 and 34(2); Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR303; 2009(111)BomLR4374

Engineer Foundary Works v. Steel Authority of India, : (2001) 6 SCC 347). An Award of an Arbitrator need to be read as a whole … can only be properties other than those at Sr. No. 3 above (i.e. Property No. 11, Ganga Kuti, Cantonment); at Sr. No. 6 above (i.e. Property No. 37, Kamla Retreat); at Sr. No. 1 above (i.e. Property … Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. These are two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( the Act).2. An arbitration Award dated 04.08.2008, which is modified on 12.09.2008, has been challenged by … at Juhu, Mumbai vacated and free from encumbrances? (Added on 3rd October, 2006)31. It is recorded in the agreement dated 20th March, 2007 between the

The State Ofandhra Pradesh,rep., by Its Vs. G.V.Mohan and 5ot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under S.3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 , means that State Government. A plain reading of the above provision shows that the competent authority … Act') pursuant to the declarations made by the petitioners in W.P.No.9198 of 2001 stood abated by virtue of Section 4 of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (for short, 'ULC Repeal Act'). The petitioners

Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others versus State of Gujarat &am ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 332

Union Territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, means that State Government.”7. Section 10 of the ULC Act speaks of acquisition of vacant land inexcess … any person duly authorised by the State Government in this behalf or by the competent authority;[2026] 1 S.C.R. 347 Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others v. State of Gujarat & Others(b) the validity of any order granting exemption

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

purposes it may be special and such a distinction cannot be blurred. 347) Thus, where there is inconsistency between the provisions of two statutes and … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Delhi Bureau of Text Books vs.director of Income Tax (E)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Nos. 807, 810, 811, & 812/2015 Page 9 of 19 (Exemptions) (2012) 347 ITR99(Del) where the dominant function of the institution was examined in order … VIII of Government Schools, Municipal Corporation of Delhi („MCD‟) schools, New Delhi Municipal Council („NDMC‟) Schools and Delhi Cantonment Schools. The books are provided at subsidized rates by the Assessee. There is nominal profit to school students … four appeals by the Delhi Bureau of Text Books („the Assessee') under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („Act‟) are directed against the common impugned order dated 23rd April 2015 passed by the ITA Nos. … ITA Nos. 2362/Del/2010, 2363/Del/2010, 3796/Del/2011 and 56/Del/2013 for the Assessment Years („AYs‟) 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively. Questions of law 2. While admitting these