Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 345 · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 19 2014

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … shall not be deemed to be an offence. Section 344 provides for finality of the appellate order and Section 345 provides that no appeal shall be decided unless the appellant has been heard, or has had a reasonable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2014

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … shall not be deemed to be an offence. Section 344 provides for finality of the appellate order and Section 345 provides that no appeal shall be decided unless the appellant has been heard, or has had a reasonable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2014

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-19-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … shall not be deemed to be an offence. Section 344 provides for finality of the appellate order and Section 345 provides that no appeal shall be decided unless the appellant has been heard, or has had a reasonable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 29 1922

Emperor Vs. Shiboo

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-29-1922

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1923)ILR45All17

Code, Sections 345(2) and 439 - Revision--Power of High Court in revision to give leave to compound. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1960

Muneshwara Nand Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-30-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 114, 198, 198B, 198B(1), 198B(13) and 345(1)

Reported in : AIR1961All24; 1961CriLJ1

Health Service was defamed - held, such member comes within purview of Schedule VII of the Constitution. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … J. 16. Turning now to Mr. Ansari's two fresh arguments, the first is based on Clause (1) of Section 345 of the Code whereby, according to him, the person defamed has been given the absolute right to compound

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1942

District Board Vs. Sri Nawas

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-31-1942

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1943All10

parties will bear their own costs both here and in Court below. The cross-objection is also dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … placed in the well-known case of the House of Lords, Cowley v. New-market Local Board (1892) 1892 A.C. 345 and in the well-known decision of the Judicial Committee Municipality of Pictou v. Geldert (1893) 1893 A.C. 524,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2006

Vasu Dev Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-07-2006

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 13 and 13A; Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966 - Sections 87 and 88; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Extension to Chandigarh) Act, 1974; Cess Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(4); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25; Rent Control Act; Punjab Rent Act, 1995 - Sections 3; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 9A; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 26; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1995; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Madras (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1946 - Sections 13; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960

Reported in : (2006)144PLR802; 2006(11)SCALE108

Matched in: Citation (2006)144PLR802; 2006(11)SCALE108

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2013

M/S. Simka Hotels and Resorts Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-17-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

municipality, municipal corporation, notified area committee, town area committee, town committee, or by any other name) or a cantonment board and which has a population of not less than ten thousand according to the last preceding census … rights/title in the said Plot.4. On 11.09.2009, Respondent No.1 issued a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) asking the petitioner to furnish its return for the assessment year 2006-2007; the said … reasons for re-opening, filed its objection and stated that the proceedings under section 148 were initiated merely on a change of opinion and were, therefore,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2026

Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others versus State of Gujarat &am ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-06-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 332

Union Territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, means that State Government.”7. Section 10 of the ULC Act speaks of acquisition of vacant land inexcess … From the date of the publication of the notification in the Official Gazette of the State[2026] 1 S.C.R. 345 Dalsukhbhai Bachubhai Satasia & Others v. State of Gujarat & Othersas per sub-Section (1) of Section 10 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

regards all the rest the earlier directions must be given effect to. 345) It is a settled legal proposition that while passing a special Act, … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial