Advanced Search Results

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … if the notice is set aside on appeal, disobedience thereof shall not be deemed to be an offence. Section 344 provides for finality of the appellate order and Section 345 provides that no appeal shall be decided unless

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … if the notice is set aside on appeal, disobedience thereof shall not be deemed to be an offence. Section 344 provides for finality of the appellate order and Section 345 provides that no appeal shall be decided unless

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … if the notice is set aside on appeal, disobedience thereof shall not be deemed to be an offence. Section 344 provides for finality of the appellate order and Section 345 provides that no appeal shall be decided unless

Prem Singh and ors. Vs. Hukam Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 27(3); Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 165, 171, 180, 202 and 204; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Rules, 1951; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 129 to 230 and 344; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act, 1950 - Sections 184 and 230

Reported in : AIR1974All50

cannot be recognized to have a retrospective effect which would divest persons of rights vested in them. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the State Government may make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this chapter. Section 344 (1) (d) of the Act provides that every power to make rules given by this act shall be

Sheoraj Singh Vs. Gauri Sahai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All227

Insolvency--Holder of decree on mortgage not entered amongst the scheduled creditors--Decree-holder not debarred from executing his decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the publication of thejudgment-debtor under Section 303 schedule.]of the Code of Civil Procedure.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Civil Procedure Code, sections, 344 et seqq - Insolvency--Holder of decree on mortgage not entered amongst the scheduled creditors--Decree-holder not debarred from executing

Saroj vs.the State of Nct Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

A.586/2006 by Appellant Saroj is directed against the judgment dated 17th February, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Crl.A. 1429/2013 & 586/2006 … same FIR No.11/2003 registered at PS, Delhi Cantonment, convicting him for the offences under Sections 120 B IPC, Section 344 IPC, Section 376 IPC, Section 376 (2) (g) IPC, Section 506 IPC and Section 5(1) (c) of ITPA. … 27 New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No.11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC read with 376 (2) (g) IPC and Section 5 … (g) IPC and Section 5 (1) (c) of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (ITPA) as well as the order on sentence dated 22nd February,

Punnu vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

A.586/2006 by Appellant Saroj is directed against the judgment dated 17th February, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Crl.A. 1429/2013 & 586/2006 … same FIR No.11/2003 registered at PS, Delhi Cantonment, convicting him for the offences under Sections 120 B IPC, Section 344 IPC, Section 376 IPC, Section 376 (2) (g) IPC, Section 506 IPC and Section 5(1) (c) of ITPA. … 27 New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No.11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC read with 376 (2) (g) IPC and Section 5 … (g) IPC and Section 5 (1) (c) of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (ITPA) as well as the order on sentence dated 22nd February,

Ram Prasad Vs. Banwari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(1), 145(5) and 344

Reported in : AIR1956All12; 1956CriLJ3

by him - Magistrate can cancel his order, if he is satisfied that no such dispute exist. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Magistrate under Sub-section (1) shall be final. The applicant bases his claim for stay upon the provisions of Section 344, Criminal P. C. That section says that if from the absence of a witness or any other reasonable

Gram Panchayat Vs. Engineer-in-chief, Irrigation and Command Area Deve ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Zila Panchayat Act

Reported in : 2002(5)ALT575

a local body had filed the Writ Petition, I do not make any order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Mandal, Krishna District to the petitioner-Gram Panchayat, as is being granted earlier in terms of A.P.P.W.D. Code Para 344, r/w. Rule 1-A and B under Appendix thereunder and pass such other suitable orders.2. Though the pleadings of

The Agricultural and Industrial Syndicate Ltd., Saharanpur Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 5 and 49

Reported in : AIR1971All134

authorities - provision of Section 5 are therefore not attracted to the proceeding under the Ceiling Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … jurisdiction. 11. Mr. Kazmi has placed reliance upon Ram Das v. State of Uttar Pradesh. 1968 RD (All) 344 where a Division Bench of this Court applied the bar of Section 5(b) (ii) of the Consolidation Act