Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 34 · Page 1 of about 275 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 13 2007

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-2007

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … power to remove the elected members of the Board except by way of power conferred upon them under Section 34 of the present Act. Section 34 of the Present Act deals with removal of members which reads as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2016

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2016

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … 248 of the Act which provide for demolition of illegally erected buildings and penalties for making illegal construction. Section 34 (1) (e) of the Act also provides for removal of a member of the Board who aids or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2003

R.V. Bhuvaneswari and ors. Vs. Ponnuboina Chencu Ramaiah (Died) and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 34(1) and 34(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD539

held, fee would be charged in accordance with Section 34 (2) and not with Section 34 (1). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 31 2003

Shanta Bai Vs. Trilok Chand and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 34(1) and 34(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD643; 2004(3)ALT694

held, court-fee must be paid in accordance with Section 34 (1) and not with Section 34 (2). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1971

Rai and Son (P) Ltd. Vs. Poysha Industries Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-04-1971

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 34 and 39

Reported in : AIR1972AP302

34 - held, stay of proceedings cannot be granted to defendant where he already admitted his liability. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 1959

Jai Kishan Srivastava Vs. Income-tax Officer, Kanpur and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-15-1959

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 226; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23, 31, 33, 34(1), 34(1A), 37 and 66

Reported in : AIR1960All19; [1960]40ITR222(All)

the proceedings only after the initiation by the Income-tax Officer - cannot apply at the early stage. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the proceedings could be competed. Thereafter, on 29-12-1954, the petitioner received seven notices purporting to be issued under Section 34(1A) of the Act from the Income-tax Officer, District 1 (ii), Kanpur, opposite party No. 1, calling upon him

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1966

Smt. Hemlata Agarwal Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-14-1966

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 33(4) and 34(1); Finance Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1968All1; [1967]64ITR428(All)

fact- find whether the impugned sum was the income of the assessee and of no one else. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … profits or gains amounting to Rs. 24.500 chargeable to income tax had escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 34(1) (a) of the Income-tax Act?'2. The material facts are these: The relevant year of assessment is the assessment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC498

a mode of succession and not transfer - application for mutation is maintainable when Will becomes operative. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … as sons of Shiv Balak, deceased and entry was made by revenue inspector, The proceedings for mutation under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act was initiated by the respondents claiming that their names should be mutated in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1976

AdhIn Singh Vs. Sahab Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 2 - Order 34, Rule 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1977All26

execution cases - not applicable to Order 34 Rule 5 where decree is yet to be pronounced. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2014

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-05-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

wall are blocking the existing road which is impermissible in law keeping in view Sec. 258 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The petitioners thereafter served notices to the respondents requesting them to stop construction of the boundary wall and … encro unauthorised constructions. 3.1.7 C. That land, management of which is vested Municipal or other public purposes, under section 108 of the Cantts (Section 122 of the Act of 2006). This category of land is not taken … Section 258 - Comparative Citations: 2014 (141) AIC 430, 2014 (4) MPHT 34, 2014 (3) MPLJ 584,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial