Advanced Search Results

Queen-empress Vs. Kallu and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All160

of pardon to accomplice who has pleaded guilty--Accomplice--Evidence--Corroboration--Practice--Accused not defended--Court to test statements of witnesses for prosecution. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … there was no irregularity in the tender of a pardon to Loka. It is urged with reference to Section 338 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Loka should not have been made an approver, because he was not

Mani Ram Vs. State Through the Notified Area

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 180, 180(1), 180(2), 180(3), 185 and 338; United Provinces Act, 1919 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR1952All40

as they stood in year 1917 - held, applicant can not be convicted under amended Section 185. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in the form in which they stood when the notification of 6.6.1917, was issued by the Government under Section 338 (1) (a) of the Act. If it is the latter then no offence was committed by the applicant.

In Re: Harshankar Parshad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All178

Act VIII of 1859, Section 338 - Act XXIII of 1861, Section 38--Execution of Decree-- Appeal--Miscellaneous proceedings. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Hotel Asoka Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer-1, Dept of Comml. Taxes

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 1(2), 3, 5B, 5(2), 6(2), 7 and 30; Kerala Finance Act, 2006 - Sections 2(1); KVAT Act, 2003 - Sections 8; Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17 and 17(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 226 and 265; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 30

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ419; (2009)25VST546(Ker)

other places.6. The Kerala Finance Bill, 2006 was passed by the Kerala State Legislature as 'The Kerala Finance Act, 2006, (Act 22 of 2006) on 19-10-2006. The Act received the assent of the Governor on 24-10-2006 and was … case of Entertainment Tax Officer v. Ambac Picture Palace (1995) 96 STC 338 has observed that, if the State legislature have competence to legislate, they … those situated within One hundred and the are of a municipal corporation forty percentor municipal council or a cantonment(b) in the case of those situated in any One hundred and other place thirty five percent.4. Section 7

Seven Hills Par Boiled Rice Mill Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8A, 8A(1), 14 and 15; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 21; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 6(1)(1)

Reported in : (2008)11VST184(AP)

2003 and the revisional orders are set aside.In the result, the writ petitions are allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … by a division Bench of this Court in Sri Laxmiganapathi Enterprises v. Commercial Tax Officer [2000] 117 STC 338 : [1999] 29 APSTJ 227, while considering almost identical formula that contained in Section 8A(1)(a) of the Act,

Deoman Upadhyaya Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 27, 161, 162 and 162(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27

Reported in : AIR1960All1; 1960CriLJ1

principles of Article 14 -Section 162 (2) as much it relates to Section 27 also becomes void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … York (1905) 201 US 633: 50 LawEd 896, In Heath and Milligan Mfg. Co. v Worst(1907) 207 US 338: 52 Law Ed 236, Mckenna J.stated the law as follows at page 354 :--'Classification must have relation to

A.K.Tyagi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

framed against the petitioner:- (i) The appellant while functioning as Store Keeper violated provisions of Rule 72 of Cantonments Accounts Code 1924 and thus had committed gross misconduct, neglect of duty, indiscipline and loss of confidence, violating … 5 SCC 673; V.Ramana v. A.P. SRTC and Ors., (2005) 7 SCC 338; R.S.Saini v. State of Punjab and Ors., JT 1999 ( 6) SC … the same in Court proceedings. He had thus violated the provisions of Section 5 of the Official Secret's Act 1923, disclosure of secrets / confidential information and betrayal of confidence in due discharge of his official duty.”

A. Rajkumar Vs. Union of India Rep by Its Senior, Dee/Op/Mas Southern ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

and FIR was filed in Cr. No. 623/2011 under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304(A) of IPC r/w 154 Railway Act at 323, 324, 326 … noted Accused, while driving the electric train MEMU No. 66017 proceeding from chennai Beach Railway Station to Vellore cantonment Railway Station, used his cellular phone, with SIM card no. 8056017713 (Subscriber Identification Module), in gross violation of … G. Shanthappa, Member(J)) The above application is filed under section of 19 of Administrative Tribunal's Act 1985 challenging the legality and propriety of the charge memo no .M/ET/OP/150/1/DAR/AR/SF5/2 dated 27.01.2012 by the respondents and

Rahul Sharma vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

employed in any establishment.23. He further relied upon the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal & Ors., 129 (2006) DLT610(DB), to WP (C) 7309/2014, WP (C) 7311/2014 … established in that behalf. Equality of opportunity is the hallmark, and the Constitution has provided also for affirmative action to ensure that unequals are not treated as equals. Thus, any public employment has to be in terms … back wages to them.5. The petitioners filed their direct industrial disputes under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short „ID Act‟) against

The Union of India Vs. M/S Best Cast Construction pvt.ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

023. THE UNION OF INDIA OWNING SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY (FORMERLY SOUTHERN RAILWAY) REP. BY CHIEF ENGINEER (CN)/CENTRAL, BANGALORE CANTONMENT BANGALORE-560 046. BETWEEN:1. 2.3. (BY SRI.ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S BEST CAST CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., NO.9, 6TH STREET, … from the date of publication of interim award in terms of Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996, Act’). Thereafter final award came to be passed on 21.01.2005 awarding a total sum