Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

The Mirzapur Electric Supply Company Limited Vs. the State of Uttar Pr ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 254 and 254(2); Uttar Pradesh Electric (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Uttar Pradesh Electric (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 38 and 47A; Uttar Pradesh Government Electrical Undertakings (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958

Reported in : AIR1975All29

paid to board does not come under arrears - notice issued to recover security is not valid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 'where a municipality is created in place of a town area or a notified area' used in Section 333-A of the U.P. Municipalities Act covered the case of a Municipality created before the enactment of Section 333-A.

New JaIn Godowns, Budaun and Another Vs. Ito, Budaun and Another

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

iii) 'CIT vs. Honda Siel Power Products Ltd.', 333 ITR 547 (Del); iv) 'CIT vs. Saluja Exim … in an urban area, i.e., (i) In any area comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, or a cantonment board having a population of not less than 10,000 as per the last preceding census published before the … a loss of ` 3,804/- was declared. Vide Order dated 08.05.2007, passed u/s 143 (3) of the IT Act, the assessment of the assessee was completed at an income of ` 86,460/- by the Assessing Officer, on … A.D. Jain, Judicial Member: 1. This is Assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 against the order dated 24.03.2009, passed by the Ld. CIT, Moradabad, enhancing … Act, failing to appreciate that the twin conditions envisaged in the said Section, i.e., the assessment order being erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of

Malik Muhammad Karim and ors. Vs. Ganga Pande and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All334

(N.W.P. Bent Act), Sections 93, 94 - Suit for recorded share of profits--Suit for settlement of accounts--Limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the claim, the ruling of the Full Bench in Rohan v. Jwala Prasad (1894) I.L.R. 16 All. 333, appears to us to show clearly that the suit falls within the first category mentioned in Section 93(h)

E.V. Ramanarasaiah and anr. Vs. G. Gnaneswar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)188; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)353; [2004]119CompCas839(AP)

open to Lower Court to decide about correctness of service of notice in respect of first petitioner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the company and responsible in its management.'11. It is clearly stated in the aforesaid decision at page 333, the word complaint has been defined in Section 2(d) of the Criminal Procedure Code and it means, any

P (by His Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor) and Another Vs. Ch ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

back to the well-known cases of Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333, paras 92-93, where the same points were made, derived from Engel v … after she had moved there she agreed to stay (para 47), but "in particular the fact that the Cantonal Appeals Commission placed the applicant in the foster home in her own interests in order to provide her … court or by the procedures known as the deprivation of liberty safeguards, set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 ("the Mental Capacity Act"). If they do not, no independent check is made on whether those arrangements … A legislative basis for such "informal" admissions to hospital was provided by section 5(1) of the Mental Health Act 1959, now contained in section 131(1)

Harikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj419

petitioner is a military personnel. At the relevant time, the petitioner was attached to 333 Missile Brigade Military Cantonment, Kamptee, District Nagpur. It is submitted that on 8-12-2005 the Petitioner alleged to have committed the offence of … demonstrate that the competent authority has forwarded the letter dated 31st May, 2006 to Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kamptee for delivering the petitioner and case … taken by the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to the Criminal Court to hand over the custody of the

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

is the same vehicle which was used in the Mahim Causeway incident. 333) It is contended on behalf of the appellant that 3 eye witnesses … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Regal Tea Depot through its Partners Vs. Altaf Abumiya Tamboli and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

he relied upon the decision of Tarachand Vs. Durgashankar, 2004 (Supp.) Bom.C.R. 333, and in particular paragraphs 8 and 9 thereof. 14. Mr. Jahagirdar also … as 'plaintiffs' for recovery of possession of shop admeasuring about 324 sq.ft. situate on the ground floor of Cantonment House No.1923, Blundell Road, Pune Camp, Pune 411 001, as more particularly described in paragraph 1 of the … on the ground of bonafide and reasonable requirement as contemplated by Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (for short 'Act') and directed the defendants to vacate the suit premises within 4 months from the

M/S Advik Industries Ltd. (Formerly Du-lite Safety Services Pvt. Ltd.) ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Vs. Diksha Enterprises, III (2010) CPJ 333 (NC) and this Commissions judgment in Revision Petition No. 1129 OF 2012, … Iron Works Pvt. Ltd. and Anr., AIR 2009 (1) SCR 1109, (2) judgments of this Commission in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. S.K. Kapoor and Associates, in Revision Petition Nos. 2501 and 2669 of 2004, decided on 26.10.2006, … controversy in this case swirls around the question, œWhether the complainant is a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986?? 2. M/s. Advik Industries Ltd. (Formerly known as Du-Lite Safety Services Pvt. Ltd.), the complainant is a … was handed over to the complainant. Ultimately, this complaint was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, on 22.07.2011. 3. We have