Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 332 · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 31 1969

Queen-empress Vs. Dalip and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All246

duty as such--Arrest without sufficient authority, but in good faith--Assault on Police making arrest--Right of private defence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … arrest him, and that the assault committed upon them in the rescue was not within the purview of Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code, the officers not being at the time in the discharge of their duty.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1919

Emperor Vs. Nirmal Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-25-1919

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1920)ILR42All67

witnesses--Resistance on the part of householder--Act No. XLV of 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Sections 332 and 503. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2011

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-26-2011

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a … bye-laws i.e. ground + 2 storeys. They quote the cases of House No. 151, Ganj Bazar, Shop No. 332, Bridge Street, Shop Nos. 102 & 103, Dal Mandi, Shop Nos. 27-27A & 28-28A, Rangsaz Mohalla, Shop No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Dubey Sahai Vs. Ganeshi Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All34

1871 Sections 4 and 5 b.--Admission of Appeal after the period of Limitation--Single Judge and Division Court--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … regular appeal shall be heard and determined by a Court of two or more Judges. This section amends Section 332 of Act VIII of 1859 ?, and it clearly refers to the number of Judges who are to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2001

AsaduddIn Owaise and anr. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 307 and 332; P.P.D Act - Sections 3 and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 39, 156, 173(2) and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act - Sections 7

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)777; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)460; 2001CriLJ3939

agency had been created - PO entitled to act as investigating officer and such investigation not vitiated. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 1 and 2 who were charge sheeted along with others for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 332, 307 I.P.C. and sections 3 and 4 of P.P.D Act and Section 7 of Criminal Amendment Act in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2006

Heavy Electricals Mazdoor Trade Union Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 1, 1(1), 1(3), 1(4), 13 and 112; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 1(2); Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Madhya Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1957 - Sections 14 and 21; States (Laws) Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 6(2); Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947; Madhya Bharat Industrial Relations (Adaptation) Act, Samvat, 2006; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 246

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR1180]; (2006)IILLJ1027MP; 2006(1)MPHT551; 2006(2)MPLJ289

Matched in: Citation [2006(109)FLR1180]; (2006)IILLJ1027MP; 2006(1)MPHT551; 2006(2)MPLJ289

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2002

ZiauddIn Ahmed Vs. M.A. Raoof (Died) by Lr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD830; 2003(4)ALT43

property - property proved to be gifted to sister - plaintiff's suit for partition held not maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 1961

Ram Kishore Vs. Raj NaraIn Dubey and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-27-1961

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1963All23

month - parties to the dispute could not move Court to appoint umpire - held, award invalid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … invalid.5. This authority was considered in a later case, Shambhu Nath v. Hari Shanker Lal, 1954 All LJ 332 : (AIR 1954 All 673), and it was laid down that where a party has Opportunity to approach

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2023

Manoj Moothedan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-24-2023

Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 188, 283, 447, 332, 308 of IPC and under Section 3(1) of PDPP Act, 1984.3. The prosecution case is that the accused organised a march to the Secretariat Gate against the policy … HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1945 CRIME NO.134/2006 OF CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LP 60/2014 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/S:1 MANOJ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2012

A.K.Tyagi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-2012

Subject : Right to Information

framed against the petitioner:- (i) The appellant while functioning as Store Keeper violated provisions of Rule 72 of Cantonments Accounts Code 1924 and thus had committed gross misconduct, neglect of duty, indiscipline and loss of confidence, violating … SC 484; Transport Commissioner, Madras-5 v. A.Radha Krishna Moorthy, (1995) 1 SCC 332; Government of Tamil Nadu and Anr. v. A. Rajapandia, AIR 1995 SC … the same in Court proceedings. He had thus violated the provisions of Section 5 of the Official Secret's Act 1923, disclosure of secrets / confidential information and betrayal of confidence in due discharge of his official duty.”

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial