Advanced Search Results

Raghubir Vs. Board of Revenue U.P. Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 331, 331(4) and 341; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act

Reported in : AIR1959All13

no fresh plea based on mixed question of law and fact can be raised in writ petition. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. He says that the only provision applicable te such appeals is Section 331 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. Section 331 contains four sub-sections. Sub-section (1) is

Gopal Krishna Vs. Lal Kishan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 1; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 331(1A)

Reported in : AIR1978All48

on him in subsequent proceedings - declaration of place of temple outside the scope of Section 92. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … it was barred by Section 92 C. P. C., and secondly, it was held to be barred by Section 331 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951. The said court has also stated in

Ram Prasad and ors. Vs. Lalli

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All74

entirely concur in, and approve, the order proposed by my brother Mahmood. Bond - Interest--'Dharta'--Illiterate agriculturist--Unconscionable bargain. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … relief, although they certainly are very cautious of interfering unless upon very strong circumstances.'--(Story's Equity Jurisprudence, 11th ed., Section 331.)6. I am of opinion that the 'strong circumstances' contemplated in this passage do exist in this case, and

Chandra Bhan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Services (C.C.A.) Rules, 1930 - Rule 55; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC739; (2003)1UPLBEC749

- dismissal is major punishment - should be passed only after complying with principle of natural justice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … U. P. and Ors., 2000 (1) AWC 96 (SC) : 1999 (8) SCC 582 : (2000) 1 VPLBEC 331 (SC), where the Supreme Court has held that failure to examine material witness, appellant a police constable, charged

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

K.Soman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

against accused 1 to 3 alone originally alleging offences under Sections 323, 331, 348 and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code … AS3D ACCUSED IN SC.NO.916/2012: -------------------------------------------------- K.SOMAN, S/O.KOCHAPPY, THOTTIVILA VEEDU, ADAYAMAN, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW RESIDING AT POLICE QUARTERS NO.G5 CANTONMENT HOUSE, VIKAS BHAVAN PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SMT.ASHA BABU SMT.AMMU CHARLES SRI.M.MANOJKUMAR (CHELAKKADAN) RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: … cases as, according to the Public Prosecutor, the conspiracy hatched in both the cases are same and the act of disappearance of evidence and creation of false documents to cover up the criminal act of accused 1 … Special Judge in Crl.M.P.No.58/2014 in SC.No.916/2012 and in Crl.M.P.No.59/2014 in SC.No.917/2012 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the

Silver Jublee Dryers and Cleaners and ors. Vs. Hiralal Nemichand Shah ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106 and 111; Bombay Rent Act - Sections 12, 12(1) and 13; Evidence Act - Sections 116; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1); Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR530; 2006(6)MhLj840

Matched in: Citation 2006(6)BomCR530; 2006(6)MhLj840

Ircon International Ltd vs.satya Prakash Builders Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was 20 months after the date of the contract i.e. 4th July, 2006. However, the contract was completed on 31st December, 2008. According to the … for construction of 811 dwelling units for the Married Accommodation Project of the Ministry of Defence at New Cantonment, Allahabad. FAO (OS) 106/2017 Page 1 of 10 4. The scheduled date of completion of work was 20 … appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of the High Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A & C Act, for short)

M/S.Rajam Industries (P) Ltd., Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

in such event, by applying the judgment of the Supreme Court in 2006 (12) SCC 33 (cited supra), there is nothing more for adjudication.29. In … fruitful purpose.(See also Shekhar Ghosh v. Union of India [(2007) 1 SCC 331] and Rajesh Kumar v. DCIT [(2007) 2 SCC 181]).A bare perusal of … M/s.Raji Industries, Trichy are required to show cause to the Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Williams Road, Trichy Cantonment, Trichy 620 001 as to why(a) an amount of Rs.2,70,99,790/- Rupees Two crores Seventy Lakhs Ninetynine thousands and … that the petitioner is liable for payment of Central Excise duty as per the Rules apart from penal action, penalty and interest, under section 11AC and 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and directing the petitioner

Assocn. Of Vasanth Appts. Owners Vs. V. Gopinanth And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Dr. Subhash Chandra Yadav and another30, this Court was considering the validity of Rule 5C of the Cantonment Funds Servants Rules, 1937. It was contended that it was contrary to Section 280(2)(c) of the Cantonment Act,