Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 33 · Page 1 of about 279 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 09 2008

Ramesh Chouksey Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-2008

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT48

of 1951 is not applicable to elections to the Cantonment Board and that only the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act of 2006') and the Rules of 2007 are applicable.11. Sub-section (1) of Section 29 … with those contained in the voter list.9. He further submitted that in the Proviso to Sub-section (4) of Section 33 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short 'the Act of 1951'), it is provided that no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1954

Mst. Latif-un-nissa and ors. Vs. Mst. Khair-un-nissa and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-22-1954

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 33, Rules 1 and 7

Reported in : AIR1955All53

court entitled to go into the question whether the original applicant was or was not a pauper. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … heirs of a person, who has made an application for leave to sue in 'forma pau-peris' under Order 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure and dies before the application is allowed or refused under Rule 7

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1999

Fathimunnisa Begum Vs. Dr. Hymavathi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-20-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 33, Rules 1 and 5

Reported in : AIR2000AP5; 1999(5)ALT705

derived by appellant's husband was very meager - held, permission granted taking into consideration facts and circumstances. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … -212 of 1989 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Khammam by which the petition filed under Order 33, Rule 1, C. P. C. by the appellant for permission to sue the respondents as an indigent person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 28 1998

Special Officer, Urban Land Ceilings, Nampally, Hyderabad and Others V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-28-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6(1), 11, 12, 15, 30, 30(1), 33, 33(2) and 34; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD824; 1998(6)ALT627

- no further appeal pending under Section 33 - held, Government competent to issue show cause notice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2001

The Management of Nisiet, Rep., by Its Prl. Director Vs. Nisiet Employ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 11A, 11B, 33C(1) and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34(2) and 152

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT773

held, Court in its jurisdiction under Section 33-C (2) cannot award interest on amount due in award. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2002

Perambaduru Murali Krishna and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 33; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1996 - Rule 22(2)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD597; 2003(1)ALT127

rule inconsistent with Section 33 - held, block reservation in favour of persons with disabilities was void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1985

Mandegam Radhakrishna Reddy Vs. Sri Bharathi Velu Bus Service and Pres ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-05-1985

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 25, 25FF, 25FFF, 33C, 33C(1), 33C(2), 36A and 37; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20 and 20(1)

Reported in : AIR1986AP102; (1986)ILLJ336AP

workman to receive money ousted jurisdiction of Labour Court under Section 33-C (2) of Industrial Disputes Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1976

Gaya Singh Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Etah and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-21-1976

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1977All54

Act, 1939 - Section 33 applies to occupancy of property as well as holding acquired by agreement. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1957

Smt. Kalawati Devi Vs. Chandra Prakash and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 3; Allahabad High Court Orders; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 22, Rule 3 - Order 33, Rules 1, 8, 9, 11 and 15; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 1

Reported in : AIR1959All37

to pay Court-fee during pendency of suit as condition precedent for her continuing suit as legal representative. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … contending that she should have been allowed, as legal representative, to continue the suit as provided under Order 33 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that she could not be ordered to pay court-fee when

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 1963

L. Madan Lal Haveliwala Vs. L. Sunder Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-15-1963

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 15, 16, 17 and 33; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 158

Reported in : AIR1964All38

for relief - does not contain necessary contents - application filed cannot be considered under Section 33. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial