Advanced Search Results

MohsIn Khan Vs. Hussaini Bibi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All156

does not operate as a decree, and is not appealable. Act VIII of 1859, s.327 - Arbitration--Award--Appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Firm Thakur Das Marakhan Lal Vs. Mathura Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 179

Reported in : AIR1958All66

by pledgor pledgee's right is extinguished - sub-pledgee could not fix upon him liabilities for larger amount. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

T. Purushotham Rao and Another Vs. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Pri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court in EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, B.S.H.B v. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH (1996) 1 SCC 327) and SPECIAL DIRECTOR v. MOHD. GHULAM GHOUSE (2004) 3 SCC 440). Learned … also assert ownership and possession for over 100 years and rely upon grant of layout by the Secunderabad Cantonment Board way back in 2008 and also on the no objection certificates issued by the Revenue and Military … questions the notice dated 31.07.2015 issued by the fourth respondent under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short the Act'). 2. A contention is raised by the petitioners with regard to the applicability

Satish Chand Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 40

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1066; (2004)1UPLBEC684

term not exceeding three months at time - impugned Order is preverse being based on no evidence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … consequences.28. In U.P.S.R.T.C. and Ors. v. Ram Chandra Yadav, 2000 (4) AWC 2709 (SC) ; (2000) 9 SCC 327, while dealing with a similar case, the Apex Court held as under :'In other words, what is required

Anamika Mondal Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 163A and 166; ;Fatal Accidents Act

Reported in : 2010ACJ65

case of Ramprasad Balmiki : 2008 ACJ 2865 (SC), the appellant was working as a driver with the Cantonment Board, Gwalior. While he was riding on a two-wheeler, a Tempo, driven rashly and negligently by the respondent … appeal is at the instance of a claimant in a proceeding under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and is directed against an award dated 7.6.2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, District 24

North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dcm Limited & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to this Court for its consideration the challenge raised to parliamentary enactments, namely, the Delhi laws (Special Provision Act), 2006 and subsequent laws which virtually extended the provisions of the Act, and the connected interim applications - with … v. Indian Charge Chrome[(1999) 7 SCC314 wherein this Court held: (SCC p. 327, para17) “17. … Mere making of an application for registration does not … time of grant of sanction. The Supreme Court referred to its earlier decision in Usman Gani J.Khatri v. Cantonment Board, (1992) 3 SCC455 wherein it had been observed: “In any case, the High Court is right in … power to seal the premises in case of its misuser - under Section 345A of the DMC Act. It further held the power to seal

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1943-A(ii) proves the remnants to be explosives and part of hand grenades. 327) On 26.04.1993, the appellant, in the presence of panch witnesses, viz., Eknath … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

Union Bank of India vs Chedda Lal Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

held that the Act makes no distinction between a permanent employee and a temporary employee, whether a probationer, 2006 SCC OnLine Del 97W.P.(C) 3388/2019 Page 3 of 7 casual, daily wager or ad hoc employee, and as … it is also pertinent to note that the workman wasengaged as a casual worker. This Court in ‘Delhi Cantonment Board v. CGIT & Ors.’1, has held that the Act makes no distinction between a permanent employee and … to refer theW.P.(C) 3388/2019 Page 1 of 7 dispute. Subsequently, a certificate Section 2A of the Act was issued, pursuant to which the workman filed … may be appropriate. The relevant portion is as follows: -(2009) 15 SCC 327(2014) 7 SCC 177W.P.(C) 3388/2019 Page 5 of 733. It is clear from

A. Rajkumar Vs. Union of India Rep by Its Senior, Dee/Op/Mas Southern ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Cr. No. 623/2011 under section 279, 337, 338, 304(A), 323, 324, 327 and 304 of IPC r/w section 151 of Railways Act. During preliminary … noted Accused, while driving the electric train MEMU No. 66017 proceeding from chennai Beach Railway Station to Vellore cantonment Railway Station, used his cellular phone, with SIM card no. 8056017713 (Subscriber Identification Module), in gross violation of … G. Shanthappa, Member(J)) The above application is filed under section of 19 of Administrative Tribunal's Act 1985 challenging the legality and propriety of the charge memo no .M/ET/OP/150/1/DAR/AR/SF5/2 dated 27.01.2012 by the respondents and