Advanced Search Results

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation … Rs.3,500/- per month and that as per the amended provisions of Section 32(c) of the Act, if the rent of the building exceeds Rs.2,000/- in

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … of any period of absence with the leave of the Board; or(c) has knowingly contravened the provisions of Section 32; or(d) being a legal practitioner, acts or appears on behalf of any other person against the Board in

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation area. … Rs.3,500/- per month and that as per the amended provisions of Section 32(c) of the Act, if the rent of the building exceeds Rs.2,000/- in

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … delegatee conferred with the powers of assessment, have had an occasion to lay sight thereon.13. Having provided so, Section 32 gives a similar opportunity to the Assessing Officer. Just like the assessee, under Section 31 has been given

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … delegatee conferred with the powers of assessment, have had an occasion to lay sight thereon.13. Having provided so, Section 32 gives a similar opportunity to the Assessing Officer. Just like the assessee, under Section 31 has been given

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … delegatee conferred with the powers of assessment, have had an occasion to lay sight thereon.13. Having provided so, Section 32 gives a similar opportunity to the Assessing Officer. Just like the assessee, under Section 31 has been given

Hyderabad Deccan Cigarettes Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax A.P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 32-A, 32-A(2), 41 and 43(3)

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD804; 1998(6)ALT701; [1999]236ITR615(AP)

to current assessment year. Dt. Ord.: 24-9-1998 Income Tax Act 1961 s.32A Income Tax Act 1961 s.43(3) - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … purposes of determining the industrial undertaking to be a small scale industrial undertaking within the meaning of Section 32-A(2)(b)(ii) ? 2. Whether the definition of (plant) given in Section 43(3) of the Act should be applied even

S. Manohar Reddy Vs. G. Koteswara Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 4, 31, 32, 46 and 47

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD567; 2004(4)ALT69

of Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - held, matter to be disposed of as directed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to them, is to make an enabling provision to deviate from the statutory Rule 5 or invoke Rule 32(b) of the General Rules. While invoking such rule also, the Government have to explain away how and in

Leelason Breweries Ltd. Vs. Sri Bheemi Reddy Lakshminarayana Reddy, Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR2002AP253; 2002(2)ALD215; 2002(1)ALT361

has conducted proper enquiry before appointing a guardian to plaintiff and thus revision petition cannot be allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in O.S.No.93/1989. By the said order, the court below, dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 32, Rule 15 read with Section 151 C.P.C. to permit one Uppalamarthi Venkata Ramana Reddy son of Sankara Reddy