Advanced Search Results

Bhagwati Vs. Banwari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All82

not given--Remedies open to decree-holder auction-purchaser--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule II, Article 138. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the judgment-debtor or his tenants, the auction purchaser may apply for delivery of possession under Section 318 or Section 319, as the case may be. Is a question which arises under either of those sections a question which

NaraIn Das Vs. Lalta Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All269

Procedure Code, Section 319--Possession--Formal possession--Effect of formal possession as against a third person other than the judgment-debtor--Limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Empress of India Vs. Ram AdhIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All139

of 1860 (Penal Code, Sections 71, 146, 147, 319, 323 - Offence made up of several offences--Rioting--Hurt. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Gangadharanandagiri Swamiji Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 324, 341, 4111 and 414; Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 190(1), 218, 219, 222, 223, 319 and 351

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)680; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)136; 2002CriLJ3446

Magistrate under the impugned order.20. For the foregoing reasons, the Criminal Revision Case fails and is dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … petitioner contends that the chief-examination of the witness alone cannot be construed as evidence so as to invoke Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('the Code' for brevity). It is his further contention that the power

K.Soman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Right to Information

SC.No.916/2012, who is the petitioner in Crl.M.C.No.3083/2014, was added as 7th accused in S.C.No.917/2012 invoking the power under Section 319 of the Code and relying on the decision reported in Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab ( 2014 … AS3D ACCUSED IN SC.NO.916/2012: -------------------------------------------------- K.SOMAN, S/O.KOCHAPPY, THOTTIVILA VEEDU, ADAYAMAN, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW RESIDING AT POLICE QUARTERS NO.G5 CANTONMENT HOUSE, VIKAS BHAVAN PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SMT.ASHA BABU SMT.AMMU CHARLES SRI.M.MANOJKUMAR (CHELAKKADAN) RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: … Prosecutor, the conspiracy hatched in both the cases are same and the act of disappearance of evidence and creation of false documents to cover up

Ram Jiyawan Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(1), 9, 9(1), (2), 11, 11(1), 11A, 12, 12(1), 15, 15-A, 16, 17, 17(1), (2), (3) and (4), 17(3A), (3B), 17A, 18, 18(1), (2) and (3), 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 31(1), (2), 32A, 34, 34(4), 38, 38A, 44B and 50; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendmet and Validation) Ordinance, 1990 - Sections 2, 4 and 6; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 6, 6(1), 11(1) and 11A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 300A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1994All38

acquisition proceedings as a failure - non compliance with subsidiary provisions will not lapse acquisition proceedings completely. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … AIR 1991 P & H 98 (DB), Sharan Pal Singh v. State of Punjab; (4) AIR 1990 RD 319 (DB) (All), Ram Avadh Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh; and (5) AIR 1991 Delhi 132, Dr. Angelo

Ahmad Ali Khan and ors. Vs. Azizullah Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All353

of Kulsum, Khadija, and Shafia Muhammadan Law - Muhammadan widow--Dower--Widow's heirs--Determination of amount of dower--Admission by co-defendant. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the appellants has cited the ruling of this Court in Balund Khan v. Janee N.W.P.H.C. Eep. 1870 p. 319 in which it was held that, where a defendant is found to be in possession of landed property

Tata Chemicals Limited, Bombay Vs. Sadhu Singh Son of Baljeet and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 22, Rule 11 - Order 41, Rule 1(3), 5(5) and 22; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 18, 23, 23(1), 23(1-A), 23(2), 24, 28, 34, 51-A and 54; Land Acqusition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57, 61, 79 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Bill, 1974

Reported in : AIR1994All66

deeds even if executed after notification - Court to consider all these factors to ascertain market value. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … In Special Tehsildar Land Acquisition v. Smt. A. Mangala Gawri, AIR 1992 SC 666 : (1992 AIR SCW 319) it has been held that the price paid in sale or purchase of the land acquired within a

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … 367), and in Central Bank of India v. C. Bernard (1991)1 SCC 319). In Pushpadevi's case, the Supreme Court explained the doctrine as under:- œWhere … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. … By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act,

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … 367), and in Central Bank of India v. C. Bernard (1991)1 SCC 319). In Pushpadevi's case, the Supreme Court explained the doctrine as under:- œWhere … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. … By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act,