Advanced Search Results

Shiam Lal and ors. Vs. NaThe Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.65

from the date of ale certificate--Right to realize rents and profits falling due before confirmation of sale. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of which, Prem Chand Pal v. Parnima Dasi 15 C. 546, the contention was raised that though under Section 316 property does not vest in the purchaser until the date of the confirmation of the sale, yet this

Jindal Strips Limited and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Reported in : (2008)12VST149(P& H)

in pursuance of order of the honourable Supreme Court dated July 14, 2006 in C. A. No. 3453 of 2002 and connected matters reported in … mean the areas within the limits of a (i) Municipal Corporation, (ii) Municipality, (iii) Notified area committee, (iv) Cantonment board, (v) Town board, (vi) Mines board, (vii) Municipal board, (viii) Gram panchayat and (ix) any other local … issue arose in the context of challenge to the constitutional validity of the Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') on the anvil of Article 301 of the Constitution/Contention raised on … supply and sanitation were meant to facilitate freeflow of trade and since Section 22 of the Act provided for distribution of tax collected among local … under (para 30 in 7 VST at page 316):22. We therefore hold that the levy of entry

The Planters Association of Tamil Nadu. Vs. the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Section 18(2), 43(1)(3); Tamil Nadu Plantations Labour Rules, 1955,; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 23(4),; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Section 7, 3(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2(J), 28(5), 33(2)(b), 55; Land Reforms Act - Section 110 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 21

the majority of the Constitution Bench has observed at pp. 314 to 316 of the Report thus: [SCC pp. 310-12: SCC (Cri) pp. 188-89, paras … applied to realise octroi from the respondents......15. He further referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Cantonment Board v. M.P. SRTC reported in (1997) 9 SCC 450 = AIR 1997 SC 2013. In paragraph 16, … relating to the order of the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.183, dated 28.12.2006 and quash the same.ORDER1. Whether the action of the State Government in notifying Section 18 of the Plantations Labour Act, 1951 (for short PL Act)

Harinder Kumar and Another Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

City. The acquired land is still further away from the city abutting Railway line on one side and Cantonment boundary on the other side. The Reference court in the aforesaid case assessed the compensation @ Rs.499/- per … thereof. Acquisition under consideration 3. (i) Vide notification dated 6.11.2003, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), State of Haryana sought to acquire land measuring 6.78 acres in the revenue … of the Act therefor was issued on 26.5.1981. For this acquisition, in 2006(2) R.C.R.(Civil) 133 : LPA No. 366 of 1999-Surinder Kumar v. State of … to 6043, 6894, 7539, 7540 of 2011; RFA Nos. 1344 to 1403, 3161 to 3200, 3312 to 3314, 4035 to 4038, 4726, 4836, 4841, 4941

Regal Tea Depot through its Partners Vs. Altaf Abumiya Tamboli and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sq.ft. is totally false. Defendants are in possession of the premises admeasuring 316 sq.ft. and not 370 sq.ft. It was denied that plaintiffs are residing … as 'plaintiffs' for recovery of possession of shop admeasuring about 324 sq.ft. situate on the ground floor of Cantonment House No.1923, Blundell Road, Pune Camp, Pune 411 001, as more particularly described in paragraph 1 of the … on the ground of bonafide and reasonable requirement as contemplated by Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (for short 'Act') and directed the defendants to vacate the suit premises within 4 months from the