Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 315 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 1918

Sidheshwari Prasad NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. Girdhar Das and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-1918

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1918)ILR40All411

in execution--Auction purchaser deprived of property purchased owing to failure of judgment-debtor's title--Suit to recover purchase money. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … litigation. There is therefore no force in this appeal. We dismiss it with costs. Civil Procedure Code (1892), Section 315 - Execution of decree--Sale in execution--Auction purchaser deprived of property purchased owing to failure of judgment-debtor's title--Suit to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 2006

A.P. Civil Supplies Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Delta Oils and Facts Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-06-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E(5), 235, 235(2), 237, 297, 301 and 642(1)

Reported in : [2007]73SCL242(AP)

as to make necessary investigation as to its affairs.34. The Company Appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1938

Babu Lal Vs. Ram Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-29-1938

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1939All37

possession and injunction against the contesting defendants. Costs in the reference will be costs in the appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … The word 'appurtenances' will be construed strictly, In re Peck and the London School Borad (1893) 2 Ch. 315 but it has a secondary meaning equivalent to 'usually enjoyed with' : see Roe v. Siddons (1888) 22

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 2014

The Union of India Vs. M/S Best Cast Construction pvt.ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-02-2014

Subject : Arbitration

023. THE UNION OF INDIA OWNING SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY (FORMERLY SOUTHERN RAILWAY) REP. BY CHIEF ENGINEER (CN)/CENTRAL, BANGALORE CANTONMENT BANGALORE-560 046. BETWEEN:1. 2.3. (BY SRI.ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S BEST CAST CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., NO.9, 6TH STREET, … from the date of publication of interim award in terms of Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996, Act’). Thereafter final award came to be passed on 21.01.2005 awarding a total sum … before High Court of Madras and both petitions 4 namely, O.P.Nos.469/2002 and 315/2006 were heard together and by order dated 08.06.2007, both petitions came to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2018

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Chief Commissioner of I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-02-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as Municipality 11 defined in section 389 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); Section 10(20A):Omitted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2002 “10(20A) any income of an … Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women.” 26. The Kishansing Tomar Municipal Corporation Of The City Of Ahmedabad Ad Others, 2006 (8) SCC352 noticing the object and purpose of Constitution 74th Amendment Act, 1992 stated as following: “12. It … made the following observations: [SCC para 22, p. 224: SCC (Tax) p. 315]. “Ordinarily a proviso to a section is intended to take out a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2018

Radha vs.food and Civil Supplies Department

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-2018

Subject : Labour and Industrial

was contended on behalf of the petitioner, whilst placing reliance on the verdict of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal and Ors. 129 (2006) DLT610 that as held therein the principle of … prescribed procedure otherwise, the constitutional mandate flowing from Articles 14, 16, 309, 315, 320 etc is violated. the regularization without (III) In case of existence … that the respondent fell within the ambit of „Industry‟ in terms of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and implicitly thus held that the termination of services of the petitioner on 31.12.2009 by the respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2021

Abdul Khuddus Vs. H.m. Chandiramani(dead) Thr Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-14-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sons v. Proposed Kumbhar Sons Hotel (P) Ltd., Second Appeal No.109 of 2006, decided on 18-7-2006 (Bom)]. and judgment and decree dated 30-11-2005 passed by … the Privy Council in Soorijomonse Dasee v. Suddanund [(1873) 12 Beng LR304 315]. and extracted the following passage as laying down the approach to the … building or parts of buildings lying within the limits of the New Delhi Municipal Committee and the Delhi Cantonment Board and in urban areas within the limits of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, which belong to or … 7.5.1974 by an allotment order passed by the Rent Controller under Section 5 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 19613. The rented portion was on the first floor of the two-floor building of Premises No.50, Ebrahim Saheb

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2010

The Union of India (Uoi) Owning Southern Railway Represented by Chief ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2010

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 34

of vitiation clause before this Court by filing O.P. No. 315 of 2006. Both the petitions were dismissed by the order under appeals.6. We have … O.S.A. No. 464 of 2009 is filed by South Western Railway represented by its Chief Engineer (CN)/Central, Bangalore Cantonment, Bangalore questioning the common order dated 8.6.2007 dismissing the original petitions filed by the appellants. The parties are … approached this Court by filing O.A. No. 535 of 2000 under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and sought for an order of injunction restraining the railway administration from invoking the vitiation clause and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial