Advanced Search Results

Empress of India Vs. Ajudhia

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All644

X of 1872 (Criminal Procedure Code), Sections 314, 452, 454,455--Act XLV of 1860 (Penal Code), Section 71. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … part due to the obstructionist tactics of state officials. Id. , at 314. Moreover, some States “resorted to the extraordinary stratagem of contriving new rules … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Balak Ram Vaish Vs. Badri Prasad Avasthi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Uttar Pradesh Home Guards Adhiniyam, 1963 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 191; State Legislature Members Prevention of Disqualifications Act - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh State Legislature Members Prevention of Disqualifications Act, 1951; State Legislature Members (Prevention of Disqualifications) (Second) Act - Sections 3(2); Uttar Pradesh State Legislature Members (Prevention of Disqualifications) (Second) Act; 1952; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 127B; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rule 114; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 77, 77(1), 77(3) and 123(6)

Reported in : AIR1969All88

per Section 77 - incurring or authorizing expenditure in contravention of Section 77 amounts to corrupt practice. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … profit.24. The next case is that of Dr. Deo-rao Laxman Anande v. Keshav Laxman Borkar. AIR 1958 Bom 314 decided by theBombay High Court. The expression 'office of profit' under the Government was analysed in that case

R. Wall and anr. Vs. J.E. Howard and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All215

Companies Act) Sections 162, 169, 214 - Appeal--Limitation--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Section 12. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Gold Company L.R. 12 Ch. D. 77 and In re Imperial Continental Water Corporation L.R. 33 Ch. D. 314. We have no hesitation in saying that in our opinion an appeal does not lie from an order

Dip Co. Op. Hsg. Society Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6, 10(5), 10(6), 19, 19(1) and 20(1); Urban Land [Ceiling and Regulation] Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 4; Tenancy Act; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2008)2GLR1382

Shaw Mill v. Addl. Collector & Competent Authority Officer (ULC) and Ors. 2006 (2) GLH 319; and of this Court in the matter of Maninagar … a notified area committee, a town area committee, a city and town committee, a small town committee, a cantonment board or a panchayat, but does not include any such land which is mainly used for the purpose … Article 227 of the Constitution of India arises from the proceedings under the Urban Land [Ceiling & Regulation] Act, 1976 [hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act of 1976']. The petitioner-Dip Cooperative Housing Society Limited [hereinafter referred to … Mohanlal Tripathi declared their holding in Form No. I as envisaged by Section 6 of the Act of 1976 as promoters of the proposed Dip … of dispute is the lands bearing Survey Nos. 314/1 & 314/2, admeasuring 12141 sq.mtrs. in aggregate of

The Planters Association of Tamil Nadu. Vs. the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Plantations Labour Act, 1951 - Section 18(2), 43(1)(3); Tamil Nadu Plantations Labour Rules, 1955,; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 23(4),; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Section 7, 3(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2(J), 28(5), 33(2)(b), 55; Land Reforms Act - Section 110 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 21

spoke for the majority of the Constitution Bench has observed at pp. 314 to 316 of the Report thus: [SCC pp. 310-12: SCC (Cri) pp. … applied to realise octroi from the respondents......15. He further referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Cantonment Board v. M.P. SRTC reported in (1997) 9 SCC 450 = AIR 1997 SC 2013. In paragraph 16, … relating to the order of the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.183, dated 28.12.2006 and quash the same.ORDER1. Whether the action of the State Government in notifying Section 18 of the Plantations Labour Act, 1951 (for short PL Act)

Mahesh Chand Vs. Mgt. of M/S Le Meridien

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of the said provision.2. The petitioners placed reliance on the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Others, 2006 (88) DRJ 7.(D.B.) in support of their plea that … services of the petitioners does not tantamount to retrenchment as defined in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act), since it is covered by clause (bb) of the said provision.2. The petitioners placed reliance … with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5312/2000 and C.M. No. 314/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.726/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999)

Sri Niwas Vs. Mgt. of M/S Le Meridien

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of the said provision.2. The petitioners placed reliance on the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Others, 2006 (88) DRJ 7.(D.B.) in support of their plea that … services of the petitioners does not tantamount to retrenchment as defined in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act), since it is covered by clause (bb) of the said provision.2. The petitioners placed reliance … with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5312/2000 and C.M. No. 314/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.726/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999)

Ramesh Chand Vs. Mgt. of M/S Le Meridien

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of the said provision.2. The petitioners placed reliance on the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Others, 2006 (88) DRJ 7.(D.B.) in support of their plea that … services of the petitioners does not tantamount to retrenchment as defined in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (the Act), since it is covered by clause (bb) of the said provision.2. The petitioners placed reliance … with Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 5312/2000 and C.M. No. 314/2013 (Arising out of I.D. No.726/91 decided by the Labour Court on 07.10.1999)

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

Matched in: Advocate F.S.Nariman, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv., i/b., ;Mahimtura and Co. in Writ Petition No. 1957, 2196, 2937 of 2006, ;J.J.Bhatt, Sr. Adv., ;Anjali Chandurkar, Adv., i/b., ;Kanga and Co. in Writ Petit Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and K.R. Belosey, G.P. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Priti Purandare, Adv. for respondent Municipal Corporation.in Writ Petition Nos. 1957 2937, 2093, 2111, 2930, 2985, 2752, 2