Advanced Search Results
Ramireddi Venkatasubba Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-03-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307; Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3 and 5
2002CriLJ770
- rest of accused acquitted of all charges levelled against them on consideration of statements of eyewitnesses. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under Section 307 I.P.C. Third charge against A1, A2, A12, A13, A15, A16, A19 and A20 was under Section 302 I.P.C. Fourth charge against A3 to A11, A14, A17, A18 and A21 was under Section 302 read with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVempati Kanuka Rao and anr. Vs. the State of A.P. and Etc.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-25-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 411; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114
2004(2)ALD(Cri)227; 2004CriLJ877
no valid grounds to punish accused for offence under Section 302 - revision liable to be dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBairam Mallesham and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-14-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302, 307 and 323
2003(2)ALD(Cri)644; 2004CriLJ860
of eye witness proved that accused guilty as weapons recovered from accused - held, accused rightly convicted. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Court through the judgment under appeal convicted the appellant-accused Nos. 2, 3 and 4 for the offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code; Sec. 307 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
G.M. Ravi Alias G. Purushotham Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-03-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32
2003(2)ALD(Cri)344; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)210; 2004CriLJ1861
under Sections 498 A and 302 set aside as no corroborative evidence along with dying declaration adduced. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKondapally Muthyalu and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Pros ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-19-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
2001(2)ALD(Cri)72
available except potent circumstantial evidences against accused - held, conviction of accused relying on circumstantial evidence justified. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … T.Ch. Surya Rao, J.1. Both the appellants stand convicted for the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC.2. The gravamen of the charge against them was that on 6.3.95 at about 10 p.m. in their
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Dowlath and anr. Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-07-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 304, 304B, 398A and 498A
2004(1)ALD(Cri)822; 2004CriLJ760; I(2004)DMC447
convicted under Section 304B - conviction under Section 304B without framing charges under that Section not maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under :'Now take the case of an accused who was called upon to defend only a charge under Section 302, IPC. The burden of proof never shifts on to him. It ever remains on the prosecution which has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVadugu Chanti Babu Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-13-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
2001(1)ALD(Cri)774; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)416
medical certificate was in corroboration of offence - appeal has no merit and liable to be dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, is the appellant herein. The accused-appellant was tried for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. On evidence, the learned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBashapaka Laxmaiah and anr. Vs. State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-25-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 34, 302 and 304; Evidence Act - Sections 25 and 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164
2001(2)ALD(Cri)225; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)154; 2001CriLJ4066
imprisonment of five years as it was out of ambit of rarest in light of above situations. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of 1997. They were tried by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Warangal, for an offence punishable under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC. On evidence, the learned judge convicted them and sentenced each of them to suffer imprisonment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEgalapati Sarojanamma Vs. State of A.P. Rep., by the Inspector of Poli ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-01-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 113A
2001(2)ALD(Cri)486; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)306; I(2002)DMC455
marriage - held, deceased did not commit suicide herself and appellant liable for offence under Section 498A. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the deceased as a result of which the deceased died, she was acquitted for the offence under Section 302 IPC. The learned Sessions Judge only considered the offence whether the accused had committed offence under Section 498A
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Ravindranatha Reddy Vs. Mareddi Ramachandra Reddy @ Chandrudu and o ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-31-2002
Criminal
Explosive Substances Act - Sections 3 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 302, 307, 326 and 427
2003(1)ALD(Cri)808
rivalry with accused - accused entitled to benefit of doubt - held, in such circumstances acquittal justified. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … herein. The first charge was under Section 148 IPC against A-1 to A7. The Second Charge was under Section 302 IPC against A-1 to A-7. The third charge was under Section 307 IPC against A-1 to A-7 for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »