Advanced Search Results

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v.

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v.

Godavari Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Products Commissioner and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 226, 298 and 299

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD783; 2004(5)ALT599; 2005(1)CTLJ535(AP)

not suffer from any arbitrariness as petitioner failed to fulfill essential criteria laid down in EOI document. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … principles of equality before law and equal protection of laws keeping in view Articles 14, 15(1), 298 and 299.(iv) All the eligible, qualified and suitable persons are entitled to claim right to be treated equally in the

Emperor Vs. F.G. Kalkhowan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1937All418

respondent to pay a fine of Rs. 20 or in default to undergo 7 days' simple imprisonment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to exhibit his show in the city at Bareilly. He was accordingly prosecuted by the Municipal Board under Section 299, Municipalities Act, for infringing certain bye-laws; but the Magistrate who tried the case has acquitted the respondent on

Saroj vs.the State of Nct Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

impugned order “without examining and considering, whether conditions Crl.A. 1429/2013 & 586/2006 Page 10 of 27 stipulated in Section 299 Cr PC and Section 33 of the Evidence Act were satisfied in the present case”.21. Accordingly, the order … 27 New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No.11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC read with 376 (2) (g) IPC and Section 5

Punnu vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

impugned order “without examining and considering, whether conditions Crl.A. 1429/2013 & 586/2006 Page 10 of 27 stipulated in Section 299 Cr PC and Section 33 of the Evidence Act were satisfied in the present case”.21. Accordingly, the order … 27 New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No.11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC read with 376 (2) (g) IPC and Section 5

Adhunik Alloys and Power Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 11, 11(5), 13, 17(2), 17(4) and 17A; Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A, 3A(1), 3B and 4; Cantonment Act, 1910; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 60; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1917 - Sections 6(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2), 6 and 7; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 15(1), 21(2), 26(1), 31, 39(1), 40, 58, 58

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]

Cantonment Boards in M.P. issued notifications during the period from 1973 to 1979 under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act 1924 imposing tax on the entry of motor vehicles at specified rates. The High Court quashed the said … v. Ganesh Wood Products : AIR1996SC149 . On the question of validity of notification of 1962, 1969 and 2006, learned Counsel submitted that since the constitutional and statutory resource of power exists, omission to mention the provisions … that MOU entered into between the parties arc not contracts under Article 299(1) of the Constitution. They are not expressed to be made by the

S. Vykuntam and 3 ors. Vs. G. Narayana and 2 ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110D; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 306; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 306 - Order 22, Rules 1 and 11; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2008ACJ40; 2007(1)ALD508

by the Tribunal is hereby modified to the extent indicated above. Appeal is partly allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the legal representatives of the claimant;(5) The Division Bench decision of this Court in Muniyappa's case 1984 A.C.J., 299 (Karnataka), related to an appeal by the claimant where enhanced compensation was sought only for personal injuries suffered

Dr. (Mrs). Usha Mehta Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Dept. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)

Reported in : 2001(6)ALT382

other questions raised by the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is therefore, dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Officer of the Secunderabad on behalf of the Revenue Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh. In terms of Article 299 of the Constitution of India, all the deeds, documents and indentures must be drawn in the name of

G. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. Uco Bank, H.O. Personnel Dept., Rep. by the Cha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Disabilities Act - Sections 47; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 12(2) and 19; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 2(K) and 47; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) (Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 1(3) and 47; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishment Act, 1966 - Sections 40; Central Civil Services (Temporary) Service Rules, 1965 - Rule 5; Central Civil Services (Temporary) Service (Amendment) Rules, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants Termination Rules, 1953 - Rule 2; UCO Bank (Officers') Service Regulations, 1979 - Regulations 3

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD142; 2007(1)ALT578; (2007)2LLJ481AP

28824 of 1995 is allowed in terms of the aforesaid observations. However, in the circumstances, without costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Orissa 1994 Supp. (3) SCC 424; Baikuntha Nath Das v. Chief District Medical Officer, Baripada (1999) 2 SCC 299}. More appropriately, it is like premature retirement. It does not cast any stigma. As long as the opinion,