Advanced Search Results

Dalip Chand and ors. Vs. the Mukhya Nagar Adhikari and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 298 and 298(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 541, 577 and 581

Reported in : AIR1964All46

Lucknow Municipal Board does not violate Article 14 and 19 of Constitution - held, not ultra vires. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … purposes of a prosecution under these bye-laws.' These bye-laws purport to have been framed under the provisions of Section 298 (2) read with list I-H(c) and (d) of the U. P. Municipalities Act (hereinafter referred to as the

Emperor Vs. Mannu

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1920)ILR42All294

trades--Licence--Power of municipal board to refuse licence--Remedy of person whose application for a licence has been refused. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … force, certain byelaws were duly promulgated by the Municipal Board of Cawnpore under Part G. (a) (x) of section. 298 of the said Act, and since then Mannu has been twice prosecuted for the offence of using the

Godavari Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Products Commissioner and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 226, 298 and 299

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD783; 2004(5)ALT599; 2005(1)CTLJ535(AP)

not suffer from any arbitrariness as petitioner failed to fulfill essential criteria laid down in EOI document. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … adhere to principles of equality before law and equal protection of laws keeping in view Articles 14, 15(1), 298 and 299.(iv) All the eligible, qualified and suitable persons are entitled to claim right to be treated equally

King-emperor Vs. Moti Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All155

(Indian Penal Code), Sections 426, 298, 504 - Mischief--Wilful pollution of food served at a caste dinner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chella Rajasekhara Reddy and ors. Vs. Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Princi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT650

months from the date of receipt of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the 2nd respondent in not passing the Award in respect of 5000 feet pipeline in S.Nos. 297/2and 298/2 of Penubarthi village,RapurMandal, Nellore District as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential direction to pass an award, fixing

V. Nirmala Vs. V. Subba Raju

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 16, Rule 2

Reported in : 2001(6)ALT521

weeks after receipt of a copy of this order. The C.M.P. 14442 of 2001 is partly allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,500/- per month. At that stage, the respondent-husband filed I.A.Nos. 298 of 2000 and 299 of 2000 to reopen the case and permit him to examine two witnesses and

1.Ashok Kumar Thalreja Vs. 1.G.Mukundan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 to 3 Vs 1.G.Mukundan 2.N.Veeradharan 3.Kasthuri .. Respondents / Plaintiffs 4.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Promenade Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-1 5.Tiruchirappalli Planning Authority near Hotel Gajapriya Royal Road, Tiruchirappalli-1 .. Respondents / Defendants 4 & 5. Prayer … approval of the plan, they have to file an appeal under Section 79 of Town and Country Planning Act. The learned counsel further submitted that the amendment will change the character of the Suit. The learned counsel

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

and Betting Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2010; The Assam Amusement and Betting Tax Act, 1939; The Orissa Entertainment Tax Act, 2006; Orissa Entertainment Tax (Amendment) Act, 2010; The Tamil Nadu Entertainments Tax Act, 1939.List of Keywords Entertainment Tax; Service … and Conclusions: ............................. 296a. Constitutional Scheme regarding distribution of Legislative Powers: ........................................................... 298 b. Service Tax: ....................................................................... 303 c. Tax on Luxuries: Entertainments & Amusements … [2005] 2 SCR 954 : (2005) 3 SCC 711 - held not per incuriam. Western India Theatres v. Cantonment Board, Poona [1959] Supp. 2 SCR 63 - followed. Union of India v. H.S. Dhillon [1972] 2 SCR … or organization” - Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2(c) - Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2001

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 3, 4; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Section 5(1), 6, 11(5), 11(2), 11(4), 17A, 17A(3), 2, 4(3), 4A, 15, 10(1), 13(2)(e), 16(1)(b), 17(1), 17A(1)(A), 18A(6), 21(5), 28, 30, 11, 7, 16(1), 9, 13(2)(a), 13, 18A(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Rules 1960 - Rule 59(2), 58; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Section 84, 85, 86, 3, 4(a); Central Act 67 of 1957 - Sections 16(1)(b), 17, 13, 9; U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 ; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Section 2; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;

21, 1962 and February 28, 1969 issued by the Government of Bihar and the Notification dated October 27, 2006 issued by the Government of Jharkhand null and void and (iv) directing the respondents to proceed under Rule … challenge. Moreover, the sovereign executive power of the State Government under Article 298 of the Constitution to carry on any trade or business and to … lease to each of the appellants in the iron ore bearing areas in Ghatkuri as applied.Bihar Land Reforms Act3. Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (for short, ‘1950 Bihar Act’) came to be enacted by the Bihar Legislature … the State and its consequences. The State Government has been empowered under Section 3 to declare that the estates or tenures of a proprietor or

The Trivandrum Chamber of Commerce and Industry, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

is pertinent to note that, by the order dated18.01.2013 in SLP(Civil)No.8519 of 2006 [Union of India v. State of Gujarat and others], the Apex Court … In Dr.Mary Anita v. Corporation of Kochi and others [2020 (6) KHC 298], a Division Bench of this :: 13 ::Court was dealing with a … THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, POLICE GROUND, C.V. RAMAN PILLAI ROAD, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695014. 4 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, CONTONMENT STATION ROAD, STATUE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695001. ADDL. R5. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT … note Clause (a) ofsub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Kerala Public Ways (Restriction of Assemblies and Processions) Act, 2011 which defines 'footpath' as any area comprised in a public way earmarked for movement of pedestrian having