Advanced Search Results

The Empress of India Vs. Kanchan Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All413

by agent.] Act X of 1872, Sections 4, 296 - Definition of sessions case--Power of Sessions Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Emperor Vs. Masit

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All78

Code), Section 296 - Disturbing a religious assembly--Religious procession on a high-way--Carrying of flags to a temple. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Shiam Kishore Vs. Madan Gopal Mahendra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 19(1), 29, 43B, 292(2), 295(1), 296, 296(1) and 296(2); Uttar Pradesh Election Petition (Presidents of Municipal Boards) Rules, 1949 - Rule 3 and 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Election Petition (Presidents of Municipal Boards) (Amendment) Rules, 1953; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1953; Municipal Corporations Act, 1882 - Sections 87; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1958All14

it - determination of issue by Election Tribunal may differ from what it is by Returning Officer. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Boards) Rules, 1949, (hereinafter referred to as the Election Petition Rules) were published. These rules were made under Section 296 (1) of the Principal Act. That subsection provides that '296 (1). The State Government shall make rules consistent

Pratap Narayan Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 2 (16), 9A and 296; U.P. Municipalities (Reservation and Allotment of Seats and Offices) Rules, 1994 - Rule 4 (1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 243P

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC99

- reserved seats coming to 3.90 - applying Rule 4, four seats should be reserved not three. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … could not be reduced from 4 to 3.4. The State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 296 of the U. P. Municipalities Act read with Section 9A of the said Act has made the U.

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia … reaffirmed its previous holding in Boswell v. Bethea , 242 Ala. 292, 296-297, 5 So. 2d 816, 820-821 (1942), that the decisions of the Board