Advanced Search Results
Raghubar Dayal Vs. Banke Lal and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1900)ILR22All182
1881 (N.-W.P. Rent Act), Sections 170, 171, 172--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 4A, 285, 295--Civil and Revenue Courts. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahi Ram Vs. Shib Lal
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1885)ILR7All378
and second mortgagees--Registered and unregistered mortgages--Act III of 1877 (Registration Act), Section 50--Civil Procedure Code, Section 295. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQueen Vs. Gholam Ismail and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1875)ILR1All1
the case may be.] Act X of 1872, Sections 4, 297 - Judicial Proceeding--High Court--Powers of Revision. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … error in any judicial proceeding of the Court, the High Court would be acting rightly in noticing it.17. Section 295 empowers any Court of Session or Magistrate of the District, at all times, to call for and examine
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shiam Kishore Vs. Madan Gopal Mahendra and ors.
Allahabad
May-09-1957
Election
Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 19(1), 29, 43B, 292(2), 295(1), 296, 296(1) and 296(2); Uttar Pradesh Election Petition (Presidents of Municipal Boards) Rules, 1949 - Rule 3 and 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Election Petition (Presidents of Municipal Boards) (Amendment) Rules, 1953; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1953; Municipal Corporations Act, 1882 - Sections 87; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1958All14
it - determination of issue by Election Tribunal may differ from what it is by Returning Officer. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … costs which are assessed at Rs. 200/-. (i) Election - municipality election - Sections 29, 43 B and 295 of the Uttar Pradesh Municipality Act 1916 - rule made under the Act by the State Government -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew JaIn Godowns, Budaun and Another Vs. Ito, Budaun and Another
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jan-31-2014
Direct Taxation
83 (SC); ii) 'CIT vs. Max India Ltd.', 295 ITR 282 (SC); iii) 'CIT vs. Honda Siel … in an urban area, i.e., (i) In any area comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, or a cantonment board having a population of not less than 10,000 as per the last preceding census published before the … a loss of ` 3,804/- was declared. Vide Order dated 08.05.2007, passed u/s 143 (3) of the IT Act, the assessment of the assessee was completed at an income of ` 86,460/- by the Assessing Officer, on … A.D. Jain, Judicial Member: 1. This is Assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 against the order dated 24.03.2009, passed by the Ld. CIT, Moradabad, enhancing … Act, failing to appreciate that the twin conditions envisaged in the said Section, i.e., the assessment order being erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPradip Tandon Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-05-1974
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(4), 16 and 340; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1975All1
such reservation save Uttarkhand area is unconstitutional and discriminating against those candidates not falling within the reservation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … was placed on another decision of this Court in Subhash Chandra v. StateOf U. P., (AIR 1973 All 295) wherein a reservation made for the 1971 Combined Pre-Medical Test was upheld. It was pleaded that the judgment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Military Estates Officer and anr. Vs. Sultan HussaIn (Died) by L ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-21-2006
PropertyCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 103; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 64; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 41, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 295 and 295(1)
2007(3)ALD538
Points 1 to 4, the Cross-Objections filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed. No order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in the revenue records, which cannot confer any title. Learned Counsel further submitted that by virtue of Article 295(1) of the Constitution of India, the Government of India became the rightful owner of all assets which originally
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeople's Movement for Civic Action through Its General Secretary, Patr ...
Mumbai Goa
Feb-26-2014
Land Acquisition
the VP that the construction was not made by respondent No.6 until 2006 or even later. Hence the initial sanction/approval/permission/licence of 31st May, 1995 has … 517 and Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal. 1987 (2) S.C.C. 295. The observations in those decisions need not be reiterated here. It is … upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay Vs. Cantonment Board and Ors., Pune being SLP No. 647 of 1992 Jt 1992(4) SC 538 with other matters in … the Town and Country Planning Department, respondent No.4, (TP) under Section 44 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 (TP Act) and the Village Panchayat Curea, Bambolim and Talaolim, Tiswadi, Goa, respondent No.2, (VP) under Regulation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskConnick Vs. Thompson
US Supreme Court
Jun-09-2011
Education
See, e.g. , Mass. Rule Prof. Conduct 1.1 and comment 6 (West 2006). Before Louisiana adopted continuing-education requirements, it imposed similar general competency requirements on … justice is done. Berger v. United States , 295 U. S. 78 , 88 (1935). “It is … must amount to “deliberate indifference to the rights of persons with whom the [untrained employees] come into contact.” Canton v. Harris , 489 U. S. 378 , 388. Deliberate indifference in this context requires proof that city … was caused by “action pursuant to official municipal policy,” which includes the decisions of a government’s lawmakers, the acts of its policymaking officials, and practices so persistent and widespread as to practically have the force of law. … .” A municipality or other local government may be liable under this section if the governmental body itself “subjects” a person to a deprivation of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarinder Kumar and Another Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-15-2015
Land Acquisition
City. The acquired land is still further away from the city abutting Railway line on one side and Cantonment boundary on the other side. The Reference court in the aforesaid case assessed the compensation @ Rs.499/- per … thereof. Acquisition under consideration 3. (i) Vide notification dated 6.11.2003, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act'), State of Haryana sought to acquire land measuring 6.78 acres in the revenue … of the Act therefor was issued on 26.5.1981. For this acquisition, in 2006(2) R.C.R.(Civil) 133 : LPA No. 366 of 1999-Surinder Kumar v. State of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »