Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 294 · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 31 1969

Queen Vs. Gholam Ismail and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All1

the case may be.] Act X of 1872, Sections 4, 297 - Judicial Proceeding--High Court--Powers of Revision. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the offences of which the accused persons are convicted, and the sentences or orders passed upon them.15. Under Section 294 [q. v. supra, I All. 4.], and probably upon the examination of any such periodical statements, as well

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2008

K. Radhakrishnan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-11-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 - Sections 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 8, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(4) and 14; Hotel Receipts Tax Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 452, 294 and 324

Reported in : 2008(2)KLJ68; 2008(2)KLT521

Radhakrishnan) in these petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is the first accused in Crime No. 782 of 2006 of Taliparamba Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 8 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act) … F.I.R. and all further proceedings in the above Crime. In Crl.M.C. No. 294 of 2008 he seeks to quash Annexure II final report and all … Special Police Officers for dealing with offences under the said Act within their respective area of jurisdiction.Thiruvananthapuram City1. Cantonment 2. Peroorkada 3. Museum4. Pettah5. Medical College6. Poonthura7. Fort8. Nemom9. Vizhinjam10. ThampanoorThiruvananthapuram Rural11. Attingal12. Varkala13. Kadakkavoor14. Kazhakuttom15. Venjaramoodu16.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2008

Khroksila Nongkhlaw Rngi Umsning Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-29-2008

Subject : Property

matter, the Full Bench not having dealt with the applicability of Article 294 of the Constitution of India in the earlier round of litigation, the … on payment of an annual rent of Rs. 50/- for construction of Civil and Military Sanitaria, Posts and Cantonment etc. It was stipulated inter alia that on payment of the aforementioned amount in advance, the petitioner's ancestors … res judicata is wholly misconceived. Even assuming that the document referred to in the civil reference portrayed the actual agreement between the petitioner's ancestor and the British Government pertaining to the same land, the decision of the … the document dated 8.12.1863 being construable as an onerous gift envisaged in Section 127 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the petitioner's right to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Dalip Rai Vs. Deoki Rai

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All204

tenant--Effect on tenant's right of his neglecting to apply under Section 95 to be restored to possession. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … The view expressed in Mazhar Rai v. Ramgat Singh (1896) I. L. R. 18 All. 290 at p. 294, that the tenancy of a tenant of agricultural land can only be determined in one or other of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2010

N. Gokula Krishnan Vs. S.A. Thirumani Nadar,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2010

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 7, 52(3), 81, 81(3), 85, 86, 86(1), 117 and 117(2); ;Rent Act; ;Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Sections 12(2) and 54(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 21(2); ;Cantonment Electoral Rules, 1945 - Rule 44; ;Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 55, 56 and 56(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 329

17.7. In State of Jharkhand v. Govind Singh : AIR 2005 SC 294, the Supreme Court had held that 'reading into Section 52(3) the power … filed by the first respondent herein to set aside the declared result of ward No. III in the Cantonment Board Election, St. Thomas Mount-cum-Pallavaram 2008, as null and void and order the first respondent functioning under the … the provisions of Rule 56 of the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007, with Section 117 Representation of the People Act, 1951, to highlight the mandatory nature of Rule 56(1) of the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007.13. The learned Counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2011

State of Himachal Pradesh. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 262 (2), 363, 3; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 78, 54(3); Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 23 Rule 6(a); Government of India Act, 1935 - Section 290-A; States Merger (Chief Commissioners Provinces) Order, 1949; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Section 11; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970 - Section 38

First Schedule of the Constitution as a Part- C State. Under Article 294 (b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion … units of the Indian Union was sovereign and independent in the sense the American colonies or the Swiss Cantons were before they formed their federal unions. The Constituent Assembly of India, deriving its power from the sovereign … were united to form a new State of Himachal Pradesh under the Himachal Pradesh and Bilaspur (New States) Act, 1954. The new State of Himachal Pradesh, however, continued to be a Part-C State until it became a … power generated in the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas Projects has been acknowledged by Section 78 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 titled “Rights and Liabilities in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2007

Cit Vs. Market Committee

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2007]294ITR563(P& H)

view of the analysis made supra.21. Reliance has also been placed on (I. T. A. No. 749 of 2006 decided on 2-6-2006), Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. CIT (2007) 294 ITR 549 wherein a Division Bench of … or management of a municipal or local fund; or(iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924).14. According to the Commissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar, the withdrawal of the exemption from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial