Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 292 · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.021 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 1958

State Vs. Thakur Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-14-1958

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 292

Reported in : AIR1959All49; 1959CriLJ9

elements are necessary ingredients to be looked into - eminency of writer or author not relevant consideration. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the State against an order of acqtiittnl of the respondents who were charged with an offence punishable under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent. No. 1 Thakur Prasad Gupta is a bookseller at Banaras and he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2016

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2016

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to … Panchamarhi in the year 2008 and was defeated by a margin of 292 votes. He filed Writ Petition No.7169 of 2008 in the High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1970

The Agricultural and Industrial Syndicate Ltd., Saharanpur Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-27-1970

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 5 and 49

Reported in : AIR1971All134

authorities - provision of Section 5 are therefore not attracted to the proceeding under the Ceiling Act. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the Full Bench decision of this Court in Raja Yuverai Datt Singh v. Prescribed Authority, 1968 All LJ 292 = (AIR 1968 All 305) (FB) by which the earlier decision in 1964 All LJ 896 was overruled.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 26 1923

Fateh Singh Vs. Thakur Rukmini Ramanji Maharaj

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-26-1923

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1923All387; (1923)ILR45All339

deceased husband made with express consent of reversioner--Reversioner not permitted to repudiate consent on succeeding to properly--Estoppel. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Bai Parvati v. Dayabhai Manchharam (1919) I.L.R. 44 Bom. 488 and Basappa v. Fakirappa (1921) I.L.R. 46 Bom. 292. The first of these decisions may fairly be described as the sheet-anchor of the plaintiff appellant's case and,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … also reaffirmed its previous holding in Boswell v. Bethea , 242 Ala. 292, 296-297, 5 So. 2d 816, 820-821 (1942), that the decisions of the … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2017

Disabled Right Group Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … first issue related to the 2 non-implementation of 3% reservation of seats in educational institutions as provided in Section 39 of the Disabilities Act, 1995 and Section 32 of the Disabilities Act, 2016. Second equally important issue … F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 292/2006 DISABLED RIGHT GROUP & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2007

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Rajasthan Power Procurement

Court : Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

Decided on : Mar-21-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Military area crossing: There was delay in getting permission from Military authorities, effecting 3 tower locations near Banbasa Cantonment area near Tanakpur.; and (d) Delay in getting shutdown for crossing UPCL feeders: Many times shutdowns on various … the general public in response to the notices published by the petitioner under Section 54 of the Electricity Act, 2003.7. As per Clause (1) of Regulation 52 of the 2004 regulations, subject to prudence check, the actual … for interest on working capital are given hereunder: (Rs. in lakh) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 (Pro rata)Maintenance Spares 157.61 163.92 173.75 184.18O & M expenses … 157.61 163.92 173.75 184.18O & M expenses 18.98 19.76 20.51 21.37Receivables 289.75 292.41 321.70 319.30Total 466.34 476.09 515.97 524.84Rate of Interest 10.25% 10.25% 10.25% 10.25%Interest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2013

Defence Estate Officer and anr Vs. Indian Oil Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judge took the view that enhancement of lease rent was in contravention of Rules 13 and 14 of Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937, which the learned Single Judge quoted in para 22 of the judgment.5. When this … respondent No. 1 for a period of five years.2. The appellant vide letter dated 05.10.1992 and purporting to act pursuant to sanction issued by Government of India, Ministry of Defence vide its letter dated 16.04.1992 called upon … the arrears were not paid, the same shall not be recovered under Section 7 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2024

M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. A.s. Raghavendra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-2024

Subject : MRTP

v. Chhitan [(2006) 12 SCC349: (2006) 11 Scale 292]. and CIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. … appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 3-2- 11 2006 [LIC v. Industrial Tribunal, Writ Appeal No.3360 of 2001, decided on 3-2-2006 … 1975, or an air transport service, or a banking or an insurance company, a mine, an oilfield, a Cantonment Board, or a major port, any company in which not less than fifty-one per cent of the paid-up … conciliation proceedings but ended in failure. However, on 27.06.2013, brushing aside the appellant’s objections that the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the “ID Act”) was not applicable in the case of the respondent as … Lakhs) and thus, was not a “workman”, within the 3 meaning of Section 2(s)1, ID Act, the “appropriate Government”2 [herein, the Government of Karnataka]. referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2011

Rakesh Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : U.P. Number and Location of Excise Shop Rules, 1968 - Rule 2 (a), 5 (2), 3, 6; United Provinces Excise Act, 1910 - Section 24 A (3), B; Uttar Pradesh Excise (Settlement of Licences for Model Shop of Foreign Liquor) Rules, 2003 - Rule 3 (c), 9

distribution and general location of shops and sub-shops shall be determined by the Collector provided that in military cantonments the Collector shall exercise this power only with the consent of the Officer Commanding the Station. 3. Principles … Rule 4, which was existing earlier and as substituted by Rules of 2006 and 2008. Under Rule 4, as it existed earlier, applications would have … of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., AIR 1981 Alld. 292 (FB), for the proposition that directions issued must … not to apply for a license. On the other hand, on behalf of the revenue, relying on the Act, Rules, policy and the advertisement, it is submitted that the right to trade in liquor is the exclusive … (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The relevant provisions for consideration are Section 24-A and Section 24-B, which read as under:- "24-A. Grant of exclusive

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial