Advanced Search Results

Raja Ram Singhji Vs. Chunni Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1897)ILR19All205

sale--Act No. IV of 1882 (Transfer of Property Act) Section 89-- Civil Procedure Code, Sections 291, 310A. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Cit Vs. Nizam Sugar Factory Ltd

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)173CTR(AP)136; [2001]253ITR68(AP)

Income Tax Act 1961 s.4 In the Andhra Pradesh High Court S.R. Nayak & Ananda Reddy, JJ. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Sahakara Sakkare Kharkane Ltd. (1992) 198 ITR 690 (Karn) and Somaiya Orgeno-Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT (1995) 216 ITR 291 (Bom) followed. Application: Also to current assessment year. Decision: In favour of assessee. Income Tax Act 1961 s.4

V. Muthukamara Ramalingam Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 291; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)896; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)110; [2003]114CompCas372(AP); [2004]55SCL543(AP)

held, complainant not needed to mention role of individual Director of company in issuance of dishonoured cheque. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the company can be proceeded against for an offence under Section 138 of the Act. 6. As per Section 291 of the Companies Act, 1956, all the powers of management of the affairs of the company as vested

Mt. Siraj Fatima and ors. Vs. Mahmood Ali and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All293

decree passed in favour of the plaintiffs-respondents is the right decree. I would therefore dismiss the appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the pronouncement of the Full Bench in the case of Muhammad Sadiq v. Laute Ram [1901] 23 All. 291. The nature of the partition proceedings in a Revenue Court, the purpose and effect of the order for

Dr. H.C. Upadhya Vs. Mrs. A.R. Rustom Fram and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - SectionS 148, 149 and 151 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD701; 2006(2)ALT170

Matched in: Citation 2006(2)ALD701; 2006(2)ALT170

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

wall are blocking the existing road which is impermissible in law keeping in view Sec. 258 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The petitioners thereafter served notices to the respondents requesting them to stop construction of the boundary wall and … encro unauthorised constructions. 3.1.7 C. That land, management of which is vested Municipal or other public purposes, under section 108 of the Cantts (Section 122 of the Act of 2006). This category of land is not taken … is a Military road and it is located entirely within G.L.R. Nos. 291 and No. 309, which are Class A(1) defence lands and the Secunderabad

Emperor Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All47

the Code of Criminal Procedure. Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 110 and 526 - Security for good behaviour--Transfer. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 16 All. 9 and in In the matter of the petition of Gudar Singh (1897) I.L.R. 19 All. 291 that a case like the present cannot be transferred to another district. The question is open to argument,

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

immediately made any such complaint about his illegal detention by the police. 291) Mr. Ponda further contended on behalf of the appellant that the Test … the duty of the court to adopt a harmonious construction by which both the provisions remain operative. (Vide: Cantonment Board, Mhow & Anr. vs. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn., AIR 199.SC 2013.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Maddula … that he was arrested 6-7 days after the blasts, hence, the date of arrest should be 19/20.03.1993, but actually he has been shown to be arrested on 30.03.1993 so he was illegally detained by the police. The … as by law established, to strike terror in the people, to alienate sections of the people and to adversely affect the harmony amongst different sections

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4, Chennai Vs. M/s. Mansi Fin ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

substantiated that there is perversity. In Bhagat Construction Co. (P) Ltd., v. CIT reported in (2001) 250 ITR 291 (Del.), the Delhi High Court held that a question of fact, becomes a question of law, if the … (a) and (b) of Section 2(14)(iii) of the Act. i.e. within the jurisdiction of a municipality or a cantonment board having population of not less than ten thousand or in an area not being more than eight