Advanced Search Results

Shri Vinod Kumar Bakshi and ors. Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 17, 28, 28(2), 29, 30 and 31; Cantonment Act, 1924; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 13(7), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1) and 19; Cantonment Board Rules - Rule 13(3)

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi131; 149(2008)DLT643

as member of the Board are concerned, the same are contained in Sections 28 & 29 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 which deserves to be … 50,000 persons and consequently it is a category 1 cantonment.10. Prior to coming into force of the Cantonment Act, 2006, the Delhi Cantonment Board was governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924 which provided for seven members on the … ward No. 3 of Delhi Cantt. on 2nd January, 2008 by the Chief Executive Officer of the Delhi Cantonment Board, and have assailed the action of the respondent No. 1 in causing to be published an electoral

Ramesh Chouksey Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT48

of 1951 is not applicable to elections to the Cantonment Board and that only the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act of 2006') and the Rules of 2007 are applicable.11. Sub-section (1) of Section 29

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … election or nomination subject to any of the disqualifications specified in Sub-section (2) of Section 28 or in Section 29; or(b) has absented himself for more than three consecutive meetings or three months (whichever is later) of the

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 … application came up for hearing and after hearing all the parties, this Court passed orders vide order dated 29.08.1961 in Appl. No.869 of 1961 in C.S.No.111 of 1955. Subsequently, Act II of 1924 was passed and it

Pfimex Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 226(2); Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 2 and 2(3); Rajasthan Improvement Act, 1959 - Sections 52(1, 2, 5 and 6)

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD52; 1998(3)AnWR426

satisfaction of Section 29 (4) (b) - Court found no reason to issue writ as prayed for. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Amar Traders Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (intellige ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 29, 29B and 29(3)

Reported in : [1998]111STC265(AP)

detain goods on suspicion - held, detention Order quashed as Section 29 (3) (b) (ii) not satisfied. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

A.S. Prasad Vs. A.P. State Financial Corporation and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Constitution of India - Article 246; Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishment Act, 1999

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD637; 2003(3)ALT780; III(2003)BC207; [2003]46SCL309(AP)

SFC to invoke statutory power conferred on it by law (State Financial Corporation Act) made by Parliament. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in invoking the powers under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (for short, 'the SFC Act') for seizing the lease, hold premises

Ramesh Prasad Vs. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Lucknow and Other ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulations 2, 5 and 29; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC34

approved - held, not employee hence provision of retrenchment not applicable - termination without notice not improper. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to be regularised. His next contention is that his services could not be terminated in violation of Regulation 29 of the U. P. Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 read with Section 6N of the U. P.

Santosh Kumar Pandey and Others Vs. Sachin-cum-general Manager, Zila S ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesService

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulations 5, 15, 19 and 29; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 5 and 29; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 6N

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC89

- appointment for specific period in respect of temporary employee - notice would not be necessary-petition dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … appointing authority within the meaning of definition thereof prescribed in Section 2 (iii) read with Section 5 (v). Section 29 has no manner of application in a case where a person is not an employee. Regulation 29 applies

Mahendra Singh Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesElection

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1966 - Sections 29(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1976All59

to hold the election within specified period, Assistant Registrar justified in nominating a fresh committee of management. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … held after the expiry of this period to the Committee of Management of the Society. A notice under Section 29 (4) of the U. P. Co-operative Socities Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was given by the