Advanced Search Results

Queen-empresa Vs. Munna Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All414

Code, Section 289 - 'No evidence'--Acquittal of accused without taking opinions of assessors--Criminal Procedure Code, Section 537. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a … 102 & 103, Dal Mandi, Shop Nos. 27-27A & 28-28A, Rangsaz Mohalla, Shop No. 158, Rangsaz Mohalla, B.No. 289, Center Road & B.No. 87-B, Hill Street, Meerut Cantt etc. in support of their contention which were sanctioned

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Chief Commissioner of I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as Municipality 11 defined in section 389 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); Section 10(20A):Omitted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2002 “10(20A) any income of an … Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women.” 26. The Kishansing Tomar Municipal Corporation Of The City Of Ahmedabad Ad Others, 2006 (8) SCC352 noticing the object and purpose of Constitution 74th Amendment Act, 1992 stated as following: “12. It … essentially has considered in the above case regarding the exemption under Article 289 of the Constitution of India whereas appellant does not rely on Article

S. Bala Krishna Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

be disputed. In Raghunath Anant Govilkar Vs. State of Maharashtra (2008(11) SCC 289) supra referring to Sreekantaiah and Amrik Singh supra observed if the act … factual matrix is that the 2nd respondent by name V.Jai Prakash is member of the 8th ward of cantonment area. The petitioner/accused is present Defence Estates Officer, Kolkota Circle, Kolkota, West Bengal and earlier worked as Chief … Magistrate, Secunderabad, who took cognizance of protest petition filed by the defacto-complainant for the offences u/sec.3(1)(X) of SCs/STs(POA) Act, 1989. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner so also the learned Public Prosecutor representing State-1st respondent … 1. This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, the CrPC') by

N. Gokula Krishnan Vs. S.A. Thirumani Nadar,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 7, 52(3), 81, 81(3), 85, 86, 86(1), 117 and 117(2); ;Rent Act; ;Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Sections 12(2) and 54(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 21(2); ;Cantonment Electoral Rules, 1945 - Rule 44; ;Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 55, 56 and 56(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 329

In M.Y. Ghorpade v. Shivaji Rao M. Poal : (2002) 7 SCC 289, the Supreme Court had held that 'Section 117 of the RP Act … filed by the first respondent herein to set aside the declared result of ward No. III in the Cantonment Board Election, St. Thomas Mount-cum-Pallavaram 2008, as null and void and order the first respondent functioning under the … the provisions of Rule 56 of the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007, with Section 117 Representation of the People Act, 1951, to highlight the mandatory nature of Rule 56(1) of the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007.13. The learned Counsel

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

Kaur, AIR 2005 SC 534; R.M. Yellatti v. Assistant Executive Engineer AIR 2006 SC 355; and Pratap Singh & Anr. v. State of M.P., AIR … on the Will, which was liable to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue record before the trial Court, the … over the suit land illegally and in an unauthorised manner on 22.2.1993 and afterwards, thus the cause of action arose to approach the court.B. The defendant no.1/appellant filed the written statement denying the averments and ownership of … adverse inference was drawn against it in view of the provisions of Section 114 clause(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter called the Evidence

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Rajasthan Power Procurement

Court : Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Military area crossing: There was delay in getting permission from Military authorities, effecting 3 tower locations near Banbasa Cantonment area near Tanakpur.; and (d) Delay in getting shutdown for crossing UPCL feeders: Many times shutdowns on various … the general public in response to the notices published by the petitioner under Section 54 of the Electricity Act, 2003.7. As per Clause (1) of Regulation 52 of the 2004 regulations, subject to prudence check, the actual … for interest on working capital are given hereunder: (Rs. in lakh) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 (Pro rata)Maintenance Spares 157.61 163.92 173.75 184.18O & M expenses … Spares 157.61 163.92 173.75 184.18O & M expenses 18.98 19.76 20.51 21.37Receivables 289.75 292.41 321.70 319.30Total 466.34 476.09 515.97 524.84Rate of Interest 10.25% 10.25% 10.25%

Omprakash Verma and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 - Sections ; 6(1), 8(1) - he Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1).8(1),10(1),23,10(3),20(1) ,6(1),

at Hyderabad in Writ Petition Nos. 4121, 4141, 4144 and 5776 of 2006 whereby the High Court dismissed all the writ petitions preferred by the … G.O. Ms.No. 733 dated 31.10.1988 read with G.O.Ms.No. 289 dated 01.06.1989 and G.O. Ms. No. 217 dated … a notified area committee, a town area committee, a city and town committee, a small town committee, a cantonment board or a panchayat, but does not include any such land which is mainly used for the purpose … Venkateswara Enterprises" represented by its Managing Partners A. Ramaswamy and A. Satyanarayana. On 01.01.1975, the A.P. Land Reforms Act, 1975 came into force. Since the land in Survey No.83 was an agricultural land, the said owners filed … into force on 17.02.1976. The owners, through their GPA, filed declarations under Section 6(1) of the ULC Act under a mistaken impression that the ULC

New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Association of Concerned Citizens of N ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provisions of Section 65 of the NDMC Act.13) On 13th February, 2006, the NDMC in its meeting discussed that the rateable value Bye-laws may … the purview of property tax assessment. This is because Articles 285 and 289 of the Constitution prohibit levy of taxes on the properties of the … entire Union Territory of Delhi including the rural areas, but excluding the New Delhi Municipal Committee and Delhi Cantonment Areas. However, the area under the jurisdiction of the NDMC was reduced from 32 sq. miles to 16 … of India in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 391 of the New Delhi Municipal Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). It is also to be noted that Section 63 of the