Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

wall are blocking the existing road which is impermissible in law keeping in view Sec. 258 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The petitioners thereafter served notices to the respondents requesting them to stop construction of the boundary wall and … encro unauthorised constructions. 3.1.7 C. That land, management of which is vested Municipal or other public purposes, under section 108 of the Cantts (Section 122 of the Act of 2006). This category of land is not taken … is further stated that the petitioners lands are situated at G.L.R. No. 287, which is part of Trimulgherry Bazar and well connected to "Main Bazar

New JaIn Godowns, Budaun and Another Vs. Ito, Budaun and Another

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

24 (Jodhpur-Trib); iii) 'General Electric International vs. ACIT', 287 ITR 43 (Mum); iv) 'Antala Sanjaykumar Ravjibhai vs. … in an urban area, i.e., (i) In any area comprised within the jurisdiction of a municipality, or a cantonment board having a population of not less than 10,000 as per the last preceding census published before the … a loss of ` 3,804/- was declared. Vide Order dated 08.05.2007, passed u/s 143 (3) of the IT Act, the assessment of the assessee was completed at an income of ` 86,460/- by the Assessing Officer, on … A.D. Jain, Judicial Member: 1. This is Assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 against the order dated 24.03.2009, passed by the Ld. CIT, Moradabad, enhancing … Act, failing to appreciate that the twin conditions envisaged in the said Section, i.e., the assessment order being erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of

S. Bala Krishna Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

1955SC 309) Sreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli Vs. State of Bombay (AIR 1955 SC 287), Matajog Dobey Vs. H.C.Bhari (AIR 1956 SC 44), Omprakash Gupta Vs. State … factual matrix is that the 2nd respondent by name V.Jai Prakash is member of the 8th ward of cantonment area. The petitioner/accused is present Defence Estates Officer, Kolkota Circle, Kolkota, West Bengal and earlier worked as Chief … Magistrate, Secunderabad, who took cognizance of protest petition filed by the defacto-complainant for the offences u/sec.3(1)(X) of SCs/STs(POA) Act, 1989. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner so also the learned Public Prosecutor representing State-1st respondent … 1. This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, the CrPC') by

Kusa Lingaiah Vs. Pandiri Laxmaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Partnership Act; Hyderabad Money Lenders Act; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Money Lenders Act - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 33

Reported in : AIR2006AP121; 2006(2)ALD98; 2006(2)ALT228

Matched in: Citation AIR2006AP121; 2006(2)ALD98; 2006(2)ALT228

M. Niranjan Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(10) and 7(3); Protection of Civil Rights Act - Sections 7(1); Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 - Rule 7

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3125

on the investigation done by the Circle Inspector of Police is quashed.4. Accordingly the revision is allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … lower Court was also aware of the judgment of this Court reported in (1999) 1 Andh LT (Crl) 287 : 1999 Cri LJ 2918, which is equivalent to (1999) 2 Andh LD (Crl) 436 (Andh Pra). In

Anand Prakash and anr. Vs. Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesArbitration

Acts : Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 - Sections 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Co-operative Societies Rules - Rules 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 126 and 127; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 27 and 27(2)

Reported in : AIR1968All22

in case petition is pending before Arbitrator - pre mature writ cannot be entertained under Article 226. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … has been expressed in Mohd Sulaiman Khan v. Mohd Yar Khan. (1888) ILR 11 All 267 at p 287 (FB) The Co-operative Societies Act and the rules have constituted the arbitrator for a limited purpose, and have

Commissioner of Income-tax, Faridabad Vs. Dinesh Verma

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

assessee. Learned counsel mainly relied upon the decision in V. Natarajan [2006] 287 ITR 271 (Mad), with reference to section 54 of the Act. 12. … municipality, municipal corporation, notified area committee, town area committee, town committee, or by any other name) or a cantonment board and which has a population of not less than 10,000 according to the last preceding census of … S.J. Vazifdar, Actg. CJ. 1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order … of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 2006-07. 2. The appellant contends that the following substantial questions of law arise

Bpl Limited, Represented by Its Authorised Signatory, Mr. M. Jebakumar ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 351 to 354, 391 and 394; Industrial Disputes Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 10(4A), 25, 25F and 25FF

Reported in : 2007(4)AIRKarR623;

workmen have admitted that they had received the notice dated 9th December 2006, the fact that they have admitted that there was an offer of … further relied on a decision reported in 1971 LAB.I.C. 854 in the matter of Management of The Ambala Cantonment Electric Supply Corporation Limited v. Workmen of The Ambala Cantonment Electric Supply Corporation Ltd and Ors. and submitted … as BPL and Sanyo BPL for convenience.3. BPL is the company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and was engaged in manufacturing of colour T.V. It had made an application before the Kerala High … T.V. It had made an application before the Kerala High Court under Sections 351 to 354 of the Companies Act, inter alia seeking arrangement for … and suffered loss to the tune of Rs. 287.8 crores at the year ending with 30th September

The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Urban Improvement Trust

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);” 15. By Finance Act, 2002, provisions of Section 10(20A) was also deleted. Section 10(20A)