Advanced Search Results

Capco Ltd. Vs. the Sales Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 286(1); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 39; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 188

Reported in : AIR1960All62; [1958]9STC553(All)

held, actual delivery took place in Uttar Pradesh - sales subjected to sales tax of U. P. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … this assessment on the ground that as the sales took place outside this State they cannot, under Article 286(1) of the Constitution, be subject to tax. For the State it is contended that as the goods sold

Bhagwan Dat and ors. Vs. Jokhan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Agriculturists' Relief Act, 1934 - Sections 10 and 12; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 286

Reported in : AIR1952All84

remit case to Civil Court - Civil Court not competent to entertain such issues remitted to it. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … proprietary rights in the properties covered by the mortgage and the Sub-Divisional Officer purporting apparently to act under Section 286, U. P. Tenancy Act, submitted the record to the Court of the learned Munsif for determination of the

Suraj Bhan Hari Shanker Vs. Sales Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 286(3); Constitution of India (Amendment) Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1963All16; [1962]13STC409(All)

from 01.04.1956 - assent received on 09/05/1956 - gur sold during the period liable for sales tax. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and Regulation of Tax), Act, 1952. Having regard to this declaration, it became necessary by reason of Article 286(3) of the Constitution that a State law imposing or authorising the imposition of tax on such a commodity

Mukund Ram and ors. Vs. Ajodhia Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property Civil

Reported in : AIR1943All210

that I dismiss this appeal with costs. Leave to appeal by way of letters patent is refused. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … than-12 years the learned Assistant Collector who tried the suit framed an issue and under the provisions of Section 286, New Tenancy Act, submitted the record to the civil Court for the decision of that issue. The plea

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

inter-state sales, -:134. :- having regard to the restriction imposed in Article 286 of the Constitution of India. (f) Next, having regard to the 42nd … HOTHUR TRADERS, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN), NO.5, 6, 7 & 8, BESIDE NANDI SCHOOL, INFANTRY ROAD, CANTONMENT, BELLARY. M/S. MEHBOOB TRANSPORT COMPANY, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN), NO.5, 6, 7 & 8, BESIDE NANDI … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA Writ Petition Nos.2642/2009 (GM-MM-S) c/w 44793/2013, 13595/2008, 13516/2008, 13654/2008, 13803/2008, … IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL

Ram Chand Textile Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3A and 24; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 4 and 8; Constitution of India - Article 286(3); Essential Goods Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1965All24; [1964]15STC340(All)

not being prescribed by rule - retrospective effect to validate the acts which would be invalid otherwise. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … valid authority for the levy of tax at the point of sale by the manufacturer, that under Article 286(3) the U. P. Sales Tax Amendment Act No. 40 of 1952 imposing tax on sale of cotton cloth

Venkataramana Rice and General Merchants, Gudivada, Krishna District V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Rural Development Act, 1996 - Sections 3, 5, 6(5) 7, 8 and 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 266, 286, 286(2), 301, 304(B); Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986; Cantonments Act, 1924; Haryana Municipal Act, 1973; Punjab Agricultural Produce Mrakets Act, 1961; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 15; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD449; 1998(6)ALT74

be a city; area declared as an urban area; and place declared to be a Cantonment under the Cantonments Act, 1924. Section 3 envisages constitution of A.P. Rural Development Board consisting of the Chief Secretary to the Government … the Constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh Rural Development Act, 1996 is being challenged as violativc of Article 286(2) of the Constitution of India on the ground that the State Legislature is not competent under any of

Muhammad Abdul Majid Vs. Ala Bux Alias Allan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925All376

Court of the District Judge of Agra. The respondent is entitled to his costs in this Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … has been called on a ruling of this Court in Madho Das y Ramji Pathak (1894) 16 All. 286, and also another ruling of a Bench of this Court in Sudarshan Das Shastry v. Ram Prasad (1911)

Abdul Shakur and ors. Vs. Kotwaleshwar Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 100 to 101 and 103; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 52, 115, 116, 117 and 167; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 49, 49(1) and 75; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118

Reported in : AIR1958All54

error - if error due to finding arrived on basis of improper evidence High Court can interfere. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the Judge.'Midnapur Zamindari Co. v. Secretary of State for India, 56 Ind App 388: (AIR 1929 PC 286) (J), was another case of like nature where-the High Court's decision on Second appeal was upset by the

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 12.12.1997. E) On 20.4.2006, the Petitioner vide Civil Appeal No.137 of 2006 appealed to District Judge Pune against the judgment and order dated 30.1.2006 … AIR 1963 SC 1561, M/s. Mathra Parshad and Sons v. State of Punjab - AIR 1962 SC 745, Cantonment Board Mhow v. M.P. State Road Transport corpn. - (1997 ) 9 SCC 450, and R.S. Raghunath v. … By this Petition, the Petitioner inter alia, seeks a declaration that Section 28-A of the Bombay Civil Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, … of the Constitution and in this regard reliance was placed upon Article 286(3) of the Constitution, which provided before its amendment in 1956, that no